We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 343

Ninth Circuit: injunctive relief claims relating only to past harms to a limited class are not exempt from arbitration

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2013

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision favoring arbitration clauses in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held

Hospitals face mandatory affirmative action obligations incorporated by operation of law into their federal subcontracts

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2013

In UPMC Braddock v. Harris, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia upheld the U.S. Department of Labor's Arbitration Review Board

Defects in an insured's own work are "unmistakably included" in the definition of "occurrence" in CGL policy, rules Second Circuit.

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2013

The Second Circuit's recent decision in Scottsdale Insurance Company v. R.I. Pools, Inc., Case No. 11-3529, 2013 WL 1150217 (2d Cir. March 21, 2013

7th Circuit holds successor liable for FLSA claims, despite buyer's disclaimer

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 11 2013

In Teed v. Thomas & Betts Power Solutions, LLC, the 7th Circuit in an opinion written by Judge Posner held that, absent a good reason to withhold

Supreme Court reverses 9th Circuit on logging roads, deferring to EPA on its Industrial Stormwater Rule

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 5 2013

On March 20, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court held in a 7-1 decision that Clean Water Act permits are not required for stormwater runoff from logging

Supreme Court raises bar for class certification

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2013

In Comcast Corporation, et al. v. Behrend, the US Supreme Court reversed two lower courts in concluding that the Plaintiffs failed to satisfy Rule

High court agrees class rep's stipulation doesn't bar federal jurisdiction

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court, in Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles, resolved the debate between the plaintiffs' bar and defense bar regarding whether

Rhode Island cleans up problematic superfund precedent that undermined federal settlements

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 21 2013

The U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island has vacated its 2010 summary judgment decision in Ashland Inc. v. GAR Electroforming, 729 F

Federal court sets guidelines for denying attorney-client privilege on communications

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 11 2013

Hiring a lawyer for a general counsel role - either in-house or by retaining outside counsel to perform that role - can benefit organizations in

Amgen does not mean the sky is falling for defendants in securities class actions

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 5 2013

Although characterized by some as an unexpected blow to defendants, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans