We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Assumption of direct responsibility for a subsidiary's liabilities - is the corporate limited liability veil in tatters?

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 9 2012

In the landmark decision of Chandler v Cape plc (2012) EWCA Civ 525 the Court of Appeal for England and Wales has upheld a High Court decision that a parent company owed a direct duty of care towards an employee of one of its subsidiaries to ensure a safe system of work

UK Supreme Court pulls trigger on asbestos liability insurance

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • June 20 2012

The UK's highest court has issued its decision in the Employers' Liability Insurance "Trigger" Litigation: BAI (Run Off) Ltd v Durham & Ors, 2012 UKSC 14 (28 March 2012), and finally resolved a long-pending dispute over insurance claims by the relatives of workers who died after being exposed to asbestos

English law: coverage of asbestos exposure hinges on wording in employers’ liability insurance

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • June 15 2011

The English courts continue to wrestle with the issues surrounding which policies of insurance, if any, must answer in both the public or commercial liability and employment contexts for alleged exposure to asbestos causing illness years later

The English approach to ‘without prejudice’: a reliable shield for settlement negotiations?

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 20 2010

The doctrine of without prejudice is as old as the hills but continues to be a contentious issue between parties when one seeks to rely on it