We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

OSC finds Coventree ABCP disclosure deficient

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 11 2011

On September 28, the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) released its decision in the case against Coventree Inc

Regulatory jurisdiction

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 19 2010

In this case, the plaintiff Royal Bank (RBC) sought to enforce its mortgage rights against the defendants by way of summary judgment

Extended warranties

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 19 2010

The plaintiff, Brick Protection, offered a number of protection plans to customers purchasing merchandise at Brick Warehouse stores

Policy interpretation - fire insurance

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 19 2010

In this case from the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, the applicants sought coverage as mortgagees under a standard mortgage clause in a fire insurance policy (the Policy

Policy interpretation - accident & sickness insurance

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 19 2010

The respondent insured, who was a beneficiary under a group insurance policy issued by the appellant, contracted herpes as a result of having unprotected sex

Landmark Alberta Court of Appeal decision upholds constitutionality of automobile insurance minor injury cap

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 17 2009

On June 12, 2009, the Alberta Court of Appeal released its landmark constitutional decision in Morrow v. Zhang, a case involving the appeal of a Court of Queen's Bench decision to strike down the Minor Injury Regulation (MIR) portion of Alberta's motor vehicle insurance regime