Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-7 of 7
Alberta Court of Appeal considers whether extended warranties are insurance products
- Stikeman Elliott LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- September 1 2011
On July 21, the Alberta Court of Appeal released its decision in Brick Protection Corporation v. Alberta (Provincial Treasurer), in which it upheld a lower court's decision that a company selling extended warranties on appliances and furniture was not carrying on the business of insurance in Alberta at the relevant time
Regulatory jurisdiction
- Stikeman Elliott LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- March 19 2010
In this case, the plaintiff Royal Bank (RBC) sought to enforce its mortgage rights against the defendants by way of summary judgment
Extended warranties
- Stikeman Elliott LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- March 19 2010
The plaintiff, Brick Protection, offered a number of protection plans to customers purchasing merchandise at Brick Warehouse stores
Policy interpretation - accident & sickness insurance
- Stikeman Elliott LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- March 19 2010
The respondent insured, who was a beneficiary under a group insurance policy issued by the appellant, contracted herpes as a result of having unprotected sex
Policy interpretation - fire insurance
- Stikeman Elliott LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- March 19 2010
In this case from the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, the applicants sought coverage as mortgagees under a standard mortgage clause in a fire insurance policy (the Policy
Court affirms priority entitlement of Canadian creditors to post-liquidation interest from Canadian branch of foreign insurance company
- Stikeman Elliott LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- September 2 2009
On July 14, 2009, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released its decision in Canada (Attorney General) v. Reliance Insurance Company, an application regarding the allocation of surplus arising from the liquidation of the Canadian branch (Reliance Canada) of U.S.-based Reliance Insurance Company (Reliance U.S.), a property and casualty insurer that was itself in liquidation
Landmark Alberta Court of Appeal decision upholds constitutionality of automobile insurance minor injury cap
- Stikeman Elliott LLP
- -
- Canada
- -
- June 17 2009
On June 12, 2009, the Alberta Court of Appeal released its landmark constitutional decision in Morrow v. Zhang, a case involving the appeal of a Court of Queen's Bench decision to strike down the Minor Injury Regulation (MIR) portion of Alberta's motor vehicle insurance regime
Current Search
- Firm Name - Stikeman Elliott LLP
- Workarea - Litigation
- Author - Stuart S. Carruthers