We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 10

Overview of comments on SEC's re-proposal of shelf eligibility conditions

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • November 2 2011

As reported earlier, on July 26, 2011 the SEC issued for comment a proposing release entitled “Re-Proposal of Shelf Eligibility for Asset-Backed Securities and Other Additional Requests” (the Re-Proposal

SEC's shelf eligibility re-proposal: still a long way to go

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 25 2011

In April, 2010 the SEC proposed a number of rules relating to shelf eligibility and various disclosure requirements in respect of asset-backed securities (the April 2010 Proposals

SEC and CSA restrictions on the exempt market for securitized products

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • May 16 2011

As reported earlier, the SEC has included in Reg AB II proposals relating to the private market

Dodd-Frank proposed risk retention rules and safe harbour for foreign transactions

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • May 9 2011

On March 29, 2011, the SEC together with a number of other federal regulators and agencies proposed rules relating to risk retention for securitizations which had been mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act in order to "provide a sponsor with an incentive to monitor and control the quality of the assets being securitized and help align the interests of the sponsor with those of investors in the ABS"

CSA proposed securitized products rules - contrast to U.S. approach

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • May 2 2011

Pursuant to Reg AB II, the Dodd-Frank Act and the rules implementing that Act (the “U.S. Proposals”), U.S. authorities have proposed the most far-reaching substantive and procedural regulations ever applied to the ABS market

SEC proposals on ABS: private placement

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2010

After last week's relatively optimistic note, its back to grim reality, in this case the Reg AB II proposals relating to the private market

SEC proposals on ABS: risk retention Part II

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 11 2010

Finally some good news

SEC proposals on ABS: representations and warranties, Part I

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 14 2010

The SEC has indentified, as a significant contributing factor to the RMBS collapse, the paucity of adequate information which would have allowed investors to make informed investment decisions and the resulting over-reliance upon ratings

SEC proposals on ABS: expansion of potential liability

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • October 7 2010

In our previous piece on the proposed Waterfall Computer Program requirement, we touched upon the unprecedented extension of securities law liability to the functionality of the computer program

SEC proposals on ABS: risk retention

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • September 16 2010

The market meltdown of 2007-2008 was a complex event and the causes will be debated for many years