Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 12

Call me maybe? ONCA says standing offers could be contract bids under Bid-Rigging Offence

Stikeman Elliott LLP
-
Canada
-
April 23 2013

Susan M. Hutton and Solène Murphy - April 3, 2013 the Ontario Court of Appeal released its reasons for decision in R v. Dowdall, affirming the

Federal Court of Appeal upholds competition tribunal's decision in the Tervita (CCS) merger

Stikeman Elliott LLP
-
Canada
-
April 5 2013

On February 25, 2013, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) released its decision upholding the Competition Tribunal's Order requiring that Tervita

CCS appeals Competition Tribunal's landfill decision; stay granted

Stikeman Elliott LLP
-
Canada
-
September 4 2012

The Canadian landfill company that lost a merger challenge at the Competition Tribunal in Canada’s first pure prevention of competition case has appealed to the Federal Court of Appeal

Ontario court clarifies application of regulated conduct defence on a pre-trial motion.

Stikeman Elliott LLP
-
Canada
-
August 31 2012

A recent decision by Justice K.M. van Rensburg of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has affirmed the applicability of the Regulated Conduct Doctrine (RCD) as a possible defence to conduct prohibited by the Competition Act while also clarifying the extent to which evidence is necessary in order to assert the defence

Real estate advisory company pleads guilty to bid-rigging

Stikeman Elliott LLP
-
Canada
-
August 31 2012

On July 30, 2012 Corporate Research Group Ltd. (CRG) pled guilty to a charge of bid-rigging under subsection 47(2) of the Competition Act

Canadian Court broadens scope of corporate liability in competition law case

Stikeman Elliott LLP
-
Canada
-
June 28 2012

On May 30, 2012, in R v Global Fuels, the Court of Québec interpreted for the first time the new section 22.2 of the Criminal Code (the Code) regarding the criminal liability of organizations

Rogers Communications claims misleading advertising case, AMPs violate Canadian Constitution

Stikeman Elliott LLP
-
Canada
-
March 2 2012

Rogers Communications Inc. will appear before the Ontario Superior Court in June, claiming that two aspects of the Competition Act dealing with civilly reviewable misleading advertising are unconstitutional: AMPs (administrative monetary penalties) in the millions of dollars, and the “adequate and proper” testing requirements

Quebec construction companies plead guilty to bid-rigging in Chicoutimi Hospital expansion project

Stikeman Elliott LLP
-
Canada
-
February 18 2012

On February 17, the Competition Bureau announced that three construction companiesConstruction G.T.R.L. (1990) Inc., Acoustique JCG Inc., and Entreprises de Construction OPC Inc.have pled guilty to charges of bid-rigging in a construction project involving the expansion of the Chicoutimi hospital

Competition Tribunal confirms possibility of dissolution as remedy in CCS case

Stikeman Elliott LLP
-
Canada
-
November 10 2011

On November 3, 2011, the Competition Tribunal issued a decision refusing to grant summary disposition to the vendor respondents in Commissioner of Competition v. CCS Corporation, thus confirming dissolution as a possible remedy in the case

Federal Court of Appeal dismisses refusal to deal appeal

Stikeman Elliott LLP
-
Canada
-
July 12 2011

On June 2, 2011, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) released its decision in Nadeau Poultry Farm Limited v. Groupe Westco Inc et al., in which it upheld the decision of the Competition Tribunal to dismiss the appellant’s complaint under s. 75 of the Competition Act (refusal to deal

next >