We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 28

U.S. Supreme Court announces new standard for pregnancy discrimination claims

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2015

On Wednesday the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS), which involves a claim of

Hawaii Supreme Court says employer failed to establish “rational relationship” between applicant’s drug conviction and position sought

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 24 2015

Hawaii, like some other states, only permits employers to consider convictions that bear a "rational relationship to the duties and responsibilities

EEOC background check litigation strategy criticized

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 1 2015

Readers who have been following the EEOC's efforts to prosecute employers who conduct background checks will be interested in the Wall Street

Fourth Circuit affirms summary judgment against EEOC in background check suit

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 23 2015

Last week, in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) v. Freeman, No. 13-2365 (4th Cir. Feb. 20, 2105), the Fourth Circuit affirmed the award

Class action stretches FCRA’s limits to target Linkedin

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 3 2014

With increasing regularity, states and localities have passed laws that limit the ability of private employers to inquire into or otherwise consider

Colorado Supreme Court set to decide seminal drug testing case

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 20 2014

As reported by Joe Palazzolo of The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Colorado's Supreme Court recently heard arguments on whether an

Backlash against EEOC enforcement initiative on background checks continues

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 6 2014

In recent years, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has taken a more aggressive position against the use of criminal history in

Sixth Circuit affirms summary judgment against EEOC in credit check suit

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2014

In Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") v. Kaplan Higher Education Corp., No. 13-3408 (6th Cir. Apr. 9, 2014), the U.S. Court of Appeals

Employment law counseling & training tip of the month

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

Now is the time of year when many employers look forward to the arrival of winterspring interns or volunteers, often students, but not infrequently

Supreme Court’s Sandifer decision is not just about changing clothes

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 13 2014

In Sandifer et al. V. United States Steel Corp., a unanimous Supreme Court clarified the meaning of "changing clothes" found in Section 203(o) of the