We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 14

Amazon.com appeals 1-Click decision

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 16 2009

Amazon.com has appealed the recent rejection of a Canadian patent application for its widely publicized 1-Click technology

New option for faster issuance of Japanese patents

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada, Japan
  • -
  • October 13 2009

Patent Prosecution Highways (PPH) have been developed by patent offices to assist in advancing the prosecution of applications containing patentable subject matter

CIPO gets aggressive with business method patents

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 25 2010

The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) has recently revised Chapter 12 "Subject Matter and Utility" and Chapter 13 "Examination" of the Manual Of Patent Office Practice (MOPOP

Amazon.com 1-Click reshaping the software patent landscape in Canada

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 27 2009

The Amazon.com 1-Click patent application describes purchasing items over the Internet using a single action by transmitting a client identifier associated with information about a buyer

Hague System may be on the horizon for Canadians seeking design rights abroad

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 31 2010

The Hague System, short for The Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Industrial Designs, is a series of international treaties that permit an applicant to file a single application to obtain industrial design protection in all member states

Rethinking patentable subject matter in Canada

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 2 2010

In a strongly worded decision, the Federal Court of Canada has quashed the Commissioner of Patents’ refusal of the Canadian patent application for Amazon.com’s “1-Click” patent application

No-go for the patentability of U-Haul business method

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 26 2010

The Canadian Patent Office has signaled its intention to continue applying the restrictive principles for patentable subject matter first established in last year's "Amazon 1-Click" decision

Federal Court says business methods are not excluded from patentability

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 25 2010

In a strongly worded decision, the Federal Court of Canada has quashed the Commissioner of Patents’ refusal of the Canadian patent application for Amazon.com’s “1-Click” patent application

Writing the next chapter in Amazon.com’s 1-Click story

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 12 2011

The next chapter in the Amazon.com “1-Click” patent application story is being written at the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal

Canadian patent office issues revised examination guidelines regarding patentable subject matter

  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • August 12 2011

The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) published on August 1, 2011, revised examination guidelines for its patent examiners in the wake of the Federal Court decision released last fall in Amazon.com Inc. v. Commissioner of Patents