Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 57
Stock drop case of the month
- Hodgson Russ LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 30 2010
A federal trial court recently ruled that an employerplan sponsor did not breach its fiduciary duties by continuing to offer company stock in its 401(k) plan even as the share price dropped
Unpaid employer contributions are plan assets
- Hodgson Russ LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 30 2010
In the face of financial difficulties, numerous challenges confront a business owner
Pension plan may be obligated to pay incorrectly calculated monthly benefits
- Hodgson Russ LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 30 2010
Courts have been reluctant to require pension plans to pay out incorrectly calculated benefits that are communicated to participants but do not properly follow the terms of the plan
Reduced lump sum doesn’t violate anti-cutback rule
- Hodgson Russ LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 28 2010
A small law firm maintained a defined-benefit, cash-balance pension plan
ESOP permitted to end company stock investment at separation
- Hodgson Russ LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 28 2010
An employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) was operated and ultimately amended to eliminate company stock from a participant's account once the participant separated from service with the company
Divorce settlement does not trump beneficiary designation
- Hodgson Russ LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 25 2010
A decedent’s ex-wife, named as beneficiary under her decedent ex-husband’s 401(k) plan, was entitled to his plan benefits, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled
401(k) fees held reasonable in Illinois lawsuit
- Hodgson Russ LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 25 2010
A number of lawsuits have been filed alleging that fees paid by 401(k) plans to recordkeepers, trustees, or other service roviders are excessive and imprudent
SPD error does not result in additional benefits for retired employees
- Hodgson Russ LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 25 2010
The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California held that former employees who received an inaccurate summary plan description (SPD) were not entitled to increased retirement benefits as a result of the error
Post-normal retirement date benefit accruals
- Hodgson Russ LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- October 29 2010
Defined benefit plan administrators can find the rules dealing with benefit accruals and actuarial adjustment after normal retirement date are complex and confusing
Seventh Circuit upholds plan’s determination that surviving spouse did not waive right to benefits
- Hodgson Russ LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- October 29 2010
Prior to his death, a participant in his company's pension plan attempted to name a trust as the primary beneficiary of his benefits under the plan
Current Search
Suggested Facets
Author
- Anita Costello Greer (57)
- Arthur A. Marrapese III (57)
- Michael J. Flanagan (57)
- Peter K. Bradley (57)
- Ranjana Kadle (1)
- Richard W. Kaiser (56)
