We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 60

How you draft a liability disclaimer really matters

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 27 2013

Contract negotiations involving limitations on liability and disclaimers of damages for breach of contract and tort claims can have significant

Employee charged with theft of company trade secrets

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 9 2010

The importance of corporate security and vigilance with regard to trade secrets was demonstrated by recent events in Syracuse, New York

The sounds of new whistleblower awards and protections under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 17 2010

With its enactment of financial reform legislation, Congress has elevated and expanded whistleblowing, giving it a more critical and mainstream function in the regulatory and enforcement scheme

Koch rattles wine auction world: GBL 350 "game changer"

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 28 2012

To successfully assert a claim under New York General Business Law 349 (h) or 350, "a plaintiff must allege that a defendant has engaged in

Just the stats please! New study provides statistical snapshot of federal court trade secret litigation

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2010

A new study of federal court trade secret litigation confirms that the number of lawsuits involving alleged trade secret misappropriation continues to grow exponentially

California Court of appeal underscores importance of proper identification of trade secrets in litigation

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 9 2009

The recent case of Perlan Therapeutics v. Superior Court (California Ct App 11042009) serves as a reminder that when litigating, the definition of the trade secrets at issue is important

OFCCP directive mandates full desk audits

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 14 2011

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (the “OFCCP”) took steps to strengthen its enforcement efforts on February 15, 2011, when it revealed a newly issued directive Directive 295 instituting a new compliance evaluation process called Active Case Enforcement (“ACE”

The Health Care Director's Compliance Duties

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 4 2009

The Governance Institute has re-issued a set of three publications co-authored by EpsteinBeckerGreen's Chair of the Board, Douglas Hastings, relating to corporate governance and corporate compliance

Emotional distress claim disallowed in business dispute

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 20 2012

In the absence of clear judicial guidelines, claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress would potentially become part and parcel of every civil litigation

Erroneous jury instructions cause Kansas Supreme Court to reverse jury verdict in trade secretrestrictive covenant case

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 22 2011

The Supreme Court of Kansas recently issued an opinion in Wolfe Electric, Inc. v. Duckworth and Global Cooking Systems, LLC, No. 99,536 (Ka. Oct. 21, 2011), a trade secret misappropriation and restrictive covenant case brought by a manufacturer of conveyor pizza ovens, Wolfe Electric, against its former president, Duckworth, and his new conveyor pizza oven company, Global Cooking Systems