We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 616

Chief federal district judge in Chicago declines to follow Illinois Appellate Court holding that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required consideration for a restrictive covenant

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 25 2014

Judge Ruben Castillo, the Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, recently declined to follow a

New draft FDA guidance on off-label uses raises concerns

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 19 2014

On March 3, 2014, FDA made available for comment a revised draft of its "Guidance for Industry: Distributing Scientific and Medical Publications on

Supreme Court declines to review CEO's personal liability

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 18 2014

The United States Supreme Court declined to review the Second Circuit's decision in Irizarry v. Catsimatidis, in which the Court of Appeals affirmed

California Supreme Court agrees to clarify suitable seating law

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 14 2014

We have written several times in this blog about California's unusual - and unusually vague - "suitable seating" law, which requires some employers

FDA seeks public comment on Revised Draft Guidance for industry: distributing scientific and medical publications on unapproved new usesrecommended practices

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 10 2014

On March 3, 2014, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") made available for comment a revised draft of its "Guidance for Industry:

Supreme Court to decide whether employees must be paid for time spent in security screenings

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 7 2014

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to resolve a split among the federal circuits regarding whether time spent in security screenings is compensable

Conspiracy to sell trade secrets to Chinese companies brings conviction for economic espionage

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 6 2014

On March 5, 2014, the U.S. Attorney's Office in San Francisco secured the first-ever federal jury conviction on charges brought under the Economic

As defendant, Obama administration takes narrower view of whistleblower protections than as enforcer will this facilitate litigation success for private employers?

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 6 2014

Employers attempting to manage corporate compliance programs while balancing privacy concerns and whistleblower protections might find a certain

Supreme Court provides expansive interpretation of coverage of Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower protection provision

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 5 2014

The Supreme Court has opened up an enormous pool of potential whistleblower claimants against employers who might not otherwise be covered by the

U.S. Bankruptcy Court exposes plaintiff scheme to suppress asbestos exposure evidence

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 3 2014

On January 10, 2014, the Hon. George R. Hodges, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina, handed down a decision