We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 79

Agencies release proposed revisions to interagency questions and answers regarding community reinvestment

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 22 2013

On March 18, the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the Agencies

The Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive how does it affect non-EU managers?

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • March 19 2013

The EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (201161EU) (the "Directive" or "AIFMD") applies to managers of alternative investment funds

Court finds personal jurisdiction over foreign business under a conspiracy theory

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 7 2012

The Delaware Supreme Court recently held that a foreign business entity was subject to personal jurisdiction in the state of Delaware under a conspiracy theory

SEC proposes rule amendments to permit general solicitation in Rule 506 and 144a offerings, including offerings by hedge funds and other private funds

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 17 2012

On August 29, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed amendments to Rule 506 of Regulation D and Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) to eliminate prohibitions against the use of general solicitation in private offerings conducted in reliance on those rules

District court rejects SEC argument that general partnership interests in joint ventures are securities

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 14 2012

The Securities and Exchange Commission brought an enforcement action against defendant Geodymanics, Inc. and others alleging fraud in connection with four oil and gas exploration and drilling ventures, each of which was governed by a separate but comparable joint venture agreement

Delaware Chancery Court grants reformation of contract to reflect prior email agreement

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 8 2012

Vice Chancellor Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery ordered reformation of a joint venture agreement where plaintiff ASB Allegiance Real Estate Fund (ASB) proved at trial, by clear and convincing evidence, that the compensation terms agreed to with defendant Scion Breckenridge Managing Member, LLC (Scion) were not accurately reflected in the parties’ final executed contract

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals rejects argument that Wisconsin corporate law is part of articles of incorporation

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 18 2012

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit rejected the argument of a dissenting shareholder in a freezout merger that provisions of Wisconsin’s corporate law were binding contractually on a company’s founders and its investors

Seller entitled to post-closing bonus payment despite changes to transaction terms

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 13 2012

The Delaware Supreme Court recently reversed a Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment in a case involving the sale of a renewable energy business

Treasury form SHC and private fund advisers

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 17 2012

Form SHC is due once every five years as part of a survey conducted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury regarding ownership of foreign securities by U.S. residents

SEC provides guidance on umbrella registration of investment advisers

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 3 2012

On January 18, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a no-action letter (the 2012 Letter) in response to a number of questions relating to the registration requirements of certain entities that are affiliated with registered investment advisers