We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 11

Voluntary application of procurement regulations - Sidey Ltd v Clackmannanshire Council

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 19 2010

In Sidey Ltd v Clackmannanshire Council 2009 CSOH 166, the Court of Session in Scotland set-aside a £2.5m contract (below threshold) concluded between a local authority and a bidder following a public procurement process

Letter before action - Michael Gillen and Flosshaul Ltd v Inverclyde Council

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 19 2010

In Michael Gillen and Flosshaul Ltd v Inverclyde Council 2010 CSOH 19, the Scottish Court of Session dismissed two actions for damages taken against Inverclyde Council for breach of the Scottish Procurement Regulations in its award of a contract for the provision of bus services

Time limits for court challenges - Commission v. Ireland

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union, Ireland
  • -
  • May 19 2010

In its judgment of 28 January 2010 in Commission v. Ireland (Case C-45608), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held that Order 84A of the Rules of the Superior Courts which sets out the procedure and timeframe for initiating a challenge to a procurement procedure is contrary to EU law

Award of contracts for non-priority service contracts may be subject to a standstill requirement

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • Ireland
  • -
  • March 16 2009

Contracting authorities awarding non-priority service contracts will need to bear in mind a recent decision from the Northern Ireland High Court which found that a standstill period may be required for such awards under fundamental principles of EC law

Dublin local authorities' waste management regime quashed

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • Ireland
  • -
  • May 19 2010

Private waste contractors, led by Panda Waste Services and represented by A&L Goodbody, succeeded in their High Court challenge to a decision by the four Dublin local authorities to vary the authorities' waste management regime

Time limits for court challenges - Uniplex (UK) Ltd v. NHS BSA

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 19 2010

On the same day as the Commission v. Ireland case, the CJEU handed down its judgment in Uniplex (UK) Ltd v. NHS Business Services Authority

Participation in more than one tender - Serrantoni and Consorzio

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • May 19 2010

In Serrantoni and Consorzio stabile edili (Case C-37608, judgment of 23 December 2009), the CJEU ruled that it is not an inherent breach of the principle of equal treatment for a consortium and a company, which is a member of that consortium, to separately bid in competition against each other in a tender

Development agreements - Helmut Muller v Bundesanstalt für Immobilienaufgaben

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • May 19 2010

In Helmut Muller GmbH v Bundesanstalt für Immobilienaufgaben (Case C-45108, judgment of 25 March 2010), the CJEU clarified the application of the EU procurement rules to development agreements

Change in subcontractor Wall v Stadt Frankfurt am Main

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • May 19 2010

In Wall v Stadt Frankfurt am Main (Case C-9108, judgment of 13 April 2010), the CJEU held that a change of subcontractor (even if the possibility of a change is provided for in the contract) may in exceptional cases constitute a material amendment to the contract where the use of a particular subcontractor was a decisive factor in awarding the contract

Late tenders - European Dynamics v EMSA

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • May 19 2010

In the recent case of European Dynamics v European Maritime Safety Agency (Case T-7005, judgment of 2 March 2010), European Dynamics challenged two separate tender procedures of the EMSA and was successful in having one contract award annulled