We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 24

FTC announces major changes to disclosure requirements for Hart-Scott-Rodino notification rules and form

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 7 2011

Companies should begin regularly collecting required data - in particular revenues by North American Industry Classification System code and information about “associates” - in advance of need to file Hart-Scott-Rodino notification

Competition law reform in Brazil: implications for merger control

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • Brazil
  • -
  • October 13 2011

Brazil’s House of Representatives passed a long-awaited competition bill (the Competition Bill) on 5 October 2011, making significant changes to Brazilian competition law

FTC issues report on authorized generics

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 2 2011

On Wednesday, August 31, the Federal Trade Commission issued a report on "Authorized Generic Drugs: Short-Term Effects and Long-Term Impacts."

Notification threshold under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act increased to $68.2 million

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 27 2012

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently announced revised thresholds for the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (HSR) and 2012 thresholds for determining whether parties trigger the prohibition against interlocking directors under Section 8 of the Clayton Act

Reverse payment settlements

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 7 2011

On Monday, a California state court of appeal affirmed a lower court's ruling upholding a "reverse payment" (pay-for-delay) settlement between Bayer (Bayer) AG and Barr Pharmaceuticals (Barr

Major changes to disclosure requirements under Hart-Scott-Rodino Act

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 5 2011

Final changes to the rules and notification form that parties to certain transactions must submit under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, became effective on 18 August 2011

CEO fined for H-S-R Act violation on acquisition of stock-based compensation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 31 2012

In December 2011, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that a public company chief executive officer (CEO) will pay a $500,000 civil penalty to settle charges that he violated Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (H-S-R Act) premerger reporting and waiting period requirements

Antitrust compliance programs: time to recalibrate your risk-benefit analysis?

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • Global
  • -
  • July 18 2012

Recent developments in the global legal landscape point to the inevitable conclusion that having an effective antitrust compliance program in place is now more important than ever

Kansas Supreme Court decision declares resale price maintenance per se illegal under state antitrust statute

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2012

The Kansas Supreme Court recently determined resale price maintenance is per se illegal under state law, becoming the latest state to reject the rule of reason standard mandated by the Supreme Court of the United States. The decision serves as a reminder that although a supplier’s pricing policies may be permissible under federal law, they may nevertheless be subject to per se condemnation under certain state statutes

Notification threshold under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act increased to $70.9 million

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2013

The Federal Trade Commission recently announced higher reporting thresholds for pre-merger notifications filed on or after February 11, 2013