We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 79

Freescale Semiconductor files new complaint

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 5 2011

On November 30, 2011 Freescale Semiconductor filed a complaint at the International Trade Commission alleging a violation of Section 337 based on the importation, sale before importation, or sale after importation of U.S. Patent No. 5,467,455

New section 337 complaint filed regarding certain liquid crystal display devices, including monitors, televisions, and modules, and components thereof

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 30 2010

Thomson Licensing SAS and Thomson Licensing LLC filed a letter and complaint requesting that the Commission conduct an investigation under section 337 regarding Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Including Monitors, Televisions, and Modules, and Components Thereof

New complaint filed under section 337

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 26 2010

On August 23, Chimei-Innolux Corporation, Chimei Optoelectronics USA, Inc. and Innolux Corporation filed a letter requesting that the Commission conduct an investigation under section 337 regarding Certain Liquid Crystal Devices and Products Interoperable with Same

Commission declines review of ID terminating DC-DC Controller investigation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 9 2010

The Commission has determined not to review an initial determination terminating Investigation No. 337-TA-698, Certain DC-DC Controllers And Products Containing Same

TPV respondents terminated from 337-TA-713 on basis of settlement agreement

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 8 2010

On September 7, 2010, ALJ Essex issued an initial determination terminating eight respondents related to Top Victory Electronics Co. of Taiwan from 337-TA-713, Certain Display Devices Including Digital Televisions and Monitors, on the basis of a settlement agreement

MIPO files unilateral motion to terminate investigation based on consent order

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 21 2010

MIPO Science and Technology Co., Ltd. and MIPO Technology Limited (collectively "MIPO") filed a unilateral motion to terminate the investigation based on a consent order in Inv. No. 337-TA-723, Certain Inkjet Ink Cartridges with Printheads and Components Thereof

ALJ Rogers denies motion for termination based on a consent order in 337-TA-723

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 5 2010

ALJ Rogers denied a renewed motion for termination based on entry of a consent order filed by respondents Mipo Science and Technology Co., Ltd. and Mipo Technology Ltd. (collectively “Mipo”) on September 30, 2010 in Inv. No. 337-TA-723, Certain Inkjet Cartridges with Printheads and Components Thereof

ALJ grants motion to terminate based on consent order in electronic paper towel dispenser investigation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 14 2010

On October 13, 2010, ALJ Gildea issued an Initial Determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-718, Certain Electronic Paper Towel Dispensing Devices and Components Thereof, granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation as to respondent Ko-Am Corporation Inc. dba Janitor’s World based on a consent order stipulation

Commission grants consent order in DC-DC controller investigation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 18 2010

The Commission granted a motion for termination of Inv. No. 337-TA-698, Certain DC-DC Controllers and Products Containing Same, filed by complainant Richtek and consented to by respondent VisionTek Products LLC per a consent order stipulation

Initial determination finds respondent Satistec, LLC in default

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 17 2010

Chief ALJ Luckern held that respondent Satistec, LLC failed to show cause for its failure to respond to the notice of investigation and, thus, issued an Initial Determination finding Satistec in default in Inv. No. 337-TA-732, In the Matter of Certain Devices Having Elastomeric Gel and Components Thereof