We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-14 of 14

High burden of proof where concerted copying is alleged

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 29 2011

In Pro-Tec Covers Ltd v Specialised Covers Ltd 2011 EWPCC 23, Richard Meade QC, sitting in the Patents County Court, has provided a detailed judgment on an unregistered design right infringement dispute, in which Pro-Tec had alleged that Specialised had undertaken “a concerted campaign of copying by at least four people, followed by a concerted campaign of lying about it and covering it up”

London 2012: advertising in the event zones

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 29 2011

England, Scotland and Wales are currently developing secondary legislation to regulate advertising activity and trading in open public places around Olympic and Paralympic events during the 2012 Games

Information Commissioner calls for compulsory data protection audits

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 29 2011

The Information Commissioner has called for an extension of powers to order the compulsory data protection auditing in sectors that are causing concern over their handling of personal information

Nominet decisions may be subject to appeal to the High Court

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 29 2011

In Michael Toth v Emirates 2011 EWPCC 18, his Honour Judge Birss QC, refused to strike out an application seeking to overturn a decision of a Nominet appeal panel that the registration of a domain name was abusive within the Nominet Dispute Resolution Service (DRS) Policy