We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 228

Four factor test when use of information is business tort

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 31 2009

In a case of first impression, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit articulated a standard under which the use of information that is not protectable as a trade secret may still form the basis of a tort action under New Jersey law

Federal Circuit affirms ITC’s claim construction

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 30 2009

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently affirmed a narrow claim construction by the International Trade Commission (ITC) and the resultant finding of non-infringement

Specification comprising summaries of papers and no experimental data does not enable treatment claims

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 31 2009

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit invalidated claims for a method of treating Alzheimer’s disease because the specification comprised a summary of six scientific papers and reported no data on the use of the compound at issue in humans

Applying the Egyptian goddess “ordinary observer” test

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2010

In two separate cases, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned a ruling of the International Trade Commission and affirmed a ruling of a district court based on the “ordinary observer” test for design patent infringement

Federal Circuit reverses Commission finding in Lucky Litter LLC v. ITC

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 6 2010

The Federal Circuit reversed the Commission’s determination of violation under section 337 and vacated the corresponding exclusion orders and cease-and-desist orders today in its opinion Lucky Litter LLC v. ITC

ALJ grants motion to terminate based on consent order in electronic paper towel dispenser investigation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 14 2010

On October 13, 2010, ALJ Gildea issued an Initial Determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-718, Certain Electronic Paper Towel Dispensing Devices and Components Thereof, granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation as to respondent Ko-Am Corporation Inc. dba Janitor’s World based on a consent order stipulation

Complaint filed over wind and solar-powered light posts and street lamps

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2010

The Commission issued notice on August 6, 2010 that Duggal Dimensions, LLC, Duggal Energy Solutions LLC and Duggal Visual Solutions Inc. has filed a Section 337 ITC complaint, naming as proposed respondents Gus Power Inc. (Canada), Efston Science Inc. (Canada), King Luminaire Inc. (USA), and The StreetCrete Group (Canada

Commission leaves in place LEO in voltage regulators enforcement action

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 4 2010

In an opinion dated August 3, 2010, the Commission has determined not to modify the existing limited exclusion order, or impose a bond against respondent Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc. (AATI), in Inv. No. 337-TA-564, Certain Voltage Regulators, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same

Two parties terminated and third party moves for termination in DC-DC controller investigation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2010

On August 5, 2010 Chief ALJ Luckern issued an initial determination granting uPI Semiconductor (uPI) and Sapphire Technology Ltd

Commission institutes Inv. No. 337-ta-740

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 10 2010

On October 6, 2010, the Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-740, Certain Toner Cartridges and Components Thereof, based on a complaint filed by Lexmark International, Inc. on August 20, 2010