We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 188

Easy Bay Municipal Utility District revisesOordinance to address concerns

  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 24 2011

Responding to the concerns of the title and escrow industry, East Bay Municipal Utility District has revised its guidelines for the Regional Private Sewer Later Ordinance No. 311

Ten CEQA litigation mistakes to avoid

  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 13 2011

Vernon Law, famed Pittsburg Pirates pitcher, once said: “Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterward”

Governor signs AB 900 to speed CEQA litigation challenging massive “green” projects

  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 27 2011

What originated as legislation to expedite anticipated CEQA challenges to the proposed Farmers Field football stadium project in Los Angeles (SB 292) transformed under Senator Darrell Steinberg’s political leadership into more ambitious legislation (SB 900) that will expedite CEQA litigation over “green” mega-development projects certified by Governor Brown as “Environmental Leadership Development Projects”

Churches and property: understanding the land use component of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA)

  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 4 2011

Land use entitlements in California are affected by countless regulations, enactments, and policies

New law requires CEQA lead agencies to identify real parties in notices

  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 11 2011

As I pointed out on September 13, 2011 (“Ten CEQA Litigation Mistakes To Avoid”), a CEQA plaintiff must not forget to name all real parties in interest since a failure to name indispensible parties under Code of Civil Procedure 389 will result in dismissal

CEQA mitigation on conservation easement lands: how a plea to legislators killed a threat to farmers’ property rights (for now)

  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 7 2011

Shortly before the close of the last legislative session, I found myself writing a strongly-worded letter (on behalf of myself and interested clients of Miller Starr Regalia) to Governor Brown, the authors of proposed SB 436 (Kehoe) and AB 484 (Alejo) and certain Senate and Assembly Committee Chairs to urge an amendment of or alternatively a “no” vote on or veto of those bills

CEQA sanctions statute: effective deterrent to abuse?

  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 21 2011

Everyone seems to talk about abuses of the CEQA process and meaningful CEQA reform, but nothing ever seems to get done, much to the chagrin of developers who find themselves the target of CEQA litigation

Supreme Court reaffirms corporate CEQA standing

  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 17 2011

Can a corporation challenge a business competitor’s or other entity’s project under CEQA when its real interests are commercial rather than environmental?

CEQA doesn’t require the killing of mice with missiles: non-prejudicial notice errors do not require project set-aside

  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 25 2011

CEQA’s information disclosure provisions are so integral to its statutory scheme that conventional harmless error analysis does not apply

Six years of separation: life after Kelo

  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 15 2011

It has been just over six years since the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark takings ruling in Kelo v. City of New London