We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Colorado joins states that exclude insurance coverage under pollution exclusion clauses for traditional and nontraditional pollution events

  • Wilson Elser
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 5 2013

Pursuant to an opinion issued by the Colorado Supreme Court (the Court) on February 25, 2013, insurance coverage may be excluded under absolute

US House of Representatives declines to vote on $60 billion in Disaster Aid

  • Wilson Elser
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 3 2013

The United States House of Representatives adjourned without voting on the $60 billion Disaster Aid package that would have provided relief to the

California Supreme Court rules policyholders in long-tail environmental claims can “stack” coverage limits over multiple policy years and take “all-sums” approach to indemnity allocation

  • Wilson Elser
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 10 2012

In State of California v. Continental Insurance Co. et al. S170560 (August 9, 2012), the California Supreme Court ruled that policyholders involved in long-tail environmental claims can “stack” coverage limits over multiple policy years and can take an “all-sums” approach to indemnity allocation

CDC’s “lead poisoning” guideline levels lowered by half

  • Wilson Elser
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 24 2012

For the first time in 20 years, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has changed its guidelines with respect to the definition of “lead poisoning,” reducing the “at risk” levels for children from a maximum of 10 ugdL to levels of 5 ugdL or greater

On rehearing, Virginia High Court again finds no “occurrence” in global warming case

  • Wilson Elser
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 26 2012

In The AES Corporation v. Steadfast Ins. Co., the Virginia Supreme Court became the first state supreme court to hold that damages in a global warming suit allegedly arising from the intentional emission of greenhouse gases did not arise from an “occurrence” as that term is defined in the relevant policy