We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 14

Reducing the cost of going where no man has gone before

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 14 2011

Under existing Board of Public Utilities Rules, developers seeking to build in undeveloped areas have been forced to bear the full cost of utility extension, while developers building in more developed, metropolitan areas, have enjoyed the benefit of sharing the expense of utility extension with existing ratepayers in the area

Planning Board can’t deny variance based on anticipated inability of applicant to satisfy site plan criteria

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 9 2011

The Bay Head Planning Board initially approved a bulk variance application submitted by a property owner who had inherited an irregular lot with just ten feet of frontage, where fifty feet was required

Good news for condo collections

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 11 2011

Collections have become an area of increasing concern for condominium associations, as unit owners struggle to pay their maintenance fees on time and in full during the current economic downturn

Victory for commercial affordable housing

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 16 2011

Private commercial developers have struggled to install affordable housing in New Jersey’s municipalities for decades, facing opposition from communities, local governments, and the municipal zoning boards

New Jersey Urban Transit Hub Tax Credits going, going, gone?

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 1 2012

The Urban Transit Hub Tax Credit program was introduced in 2008 to provide financial incentive to developers, property owners, and tenants to make substantial capital investments in Urban Transit Hubs

New Jersey Supreme Court considers condominium association's ban on window signs

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 4 2011

On September 1, 2010, a three-judge panel of the New Jersey Appellate Division struck down, as an unconstitutional limitation on free speech, a condominium association’s governing documents’ prohibition on posting signs in unit windows, with the exception of a single “For Sale” sign

NJ Appellate Division invalidates abolition of COAH

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 9 2012

The Appellate Division issued an opinion on March 8, 2012 invalidating Governor Christie’s Reorganization Plan 001-2011

Actions speak louder than words: Appellate Division will not disturb third round substantive certification where municipality has taken action to create affordable housing

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 16 2012

The Appellate Division issued an opinion on March 14, 2012 where it declined to revoke COAH’s third round substantive certification of Readington’s Fair Share Plan

Use ‘em or lose ‘em: municipal affordable housing money to be ceded to state

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 20 2012

Municipalities have been collecting non-residential developments fees of 2.5 from non-residential developers since 2008, until the state placed a moratorium on these fees to stimulate the New Jersey economy

Eliminating the hidden charges of development: the Appellate Division holds that subdivision developer cannot be required to pay detention basin maintenance contribution

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 22 2012

Even after the land use approval has been won, developers still face a myriad of fees and escrow payments to get their job done