We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 16

Sunshine Act: indirect payments: reportable or excluded?

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 8 2013

All too often, a payment from an applicable manufacturer does not go directly to a physician or teaching hospital. Instead, the applicable

Sunshine Act: reporting food, CME, and researchoh my!

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 6 2013

As the life sciences industry continues to prepare to begin collecting data on payments and transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals

The who and the what of the Sunshine Act regulations

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 5 2013

With the long awaited Sunshine Act final regulations in hand, members of the life sciences industry continue to sift through the 285 page regulatory

CMS announces the release of the final regulations implementing the Sunshine Act...finally!

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 4 2013

On Friday, February 1, 2013, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced the much anticipated release of the final

A quick observation regarding the FDA and the Caronia decision

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 1 2013

On December 3, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed down its decision in U.S. v. Caronia, and ruled that the

Senators Grassley and Kohl send another letter to CMS regarding implementation of the Sunshine Act

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 5 2012

Senators Charles Grassley and Herb Kohl have sent a letter to Marilyn Tavenner, Acting Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS"), regarding implementation of the “Transparency Reports and Reporting of Physician Ownership or Investment Interests” section of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”

Democrats set sights on medical device safety regulation

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 30 2012

Ink-like clouds suffused over our nation’s capitol as a murder of crows converges upon fresh carrion

Supreme Court to hear cases on health care reform law

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 21 2011

On November 14th, 2011, the Supreme Court announced in an order that it will hear arguments on three cases from the 11th Circuit challenging the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”): National Federation of Independent Business v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.; Florida v. Department of Health and Human Services; and Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida

Ain’t no sunshine in CMS’ response

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 11 2011

By way of a scant, one-page letter dated October 28th, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) finally issued a belated response to the letter co-signed by Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Herb Kohl (D-Wis.) that demanded answers from CMS for its failure to issue the Federal Physician Payment Sunshine Act (“Sunshine Act”) regulations by the October 1st regulatory deadline

CMS called to task for missing October 1st deadline

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 5 2011

October 1st came and went with no word from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) regarding the long awaited Federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (“Sunshine Act”) regulations