We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In Parada v. Superior Court, 2009 DJDAR 12745 (August 27, 2009), the Fourth District Court of Appeal held an arbitration clause in contracts between an investment company and its customers requiring a three-arbitrator panel was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable where the company failed to justify it
