Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 28
ALJ Bullock issues claim construction order in certain digital televisions and components thereof (337-TA-806)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 19 2012
On April 13, 2012, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued Order No. 6 construing certain terms of the asserted claims in Certain Digital Televisions and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-806
ALJ Gildea denies motion to strike in Certain Equipment for Communications Networks (337-TA-778)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 14 2012
On March 7, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued Order No. 34 denying Complainant MOSAID Technologies Inc.’s (“MOSAID”) motion to strike Respondents’ exhibit objections, and ordered MOSAID to show cause as to why it should not be sanctioned for filing its motion in Certain Equipment for Communications Networks, Including Switches, Routers, Gateways, Bridges, Wireless Access Points, Cable Modems, IP Phones, and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-778
ALJ Pender issues public version of initial determination finding a violation of Section 337 in Certain Wireless Communication Devices (337-TA-745)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 31 2012
On May 16, 2012, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued the public version of the Initial Determination (“ID”) (dated April 24, 2012) in Certain Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, Computers, and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-745
ALJ Gildea denies motion to disqualify counsel in certain dynamic random access memory and nand flash memory devices (337-TA-803)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 8 2012
On June 5, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 40 (dated April 18, 2012) denying Respondents’ motion to disqualify a law firm as counsel for Complainants in Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory and NAND Flash Memory Devices and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-803
ALJ Gildea rules on motion to compel in Certain Electronic Devices with Graphics Data Processing Systems (337-TA-813)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 27 2012
On April 20, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 12 (dated April 9, 2012) denying Complainants’ S3 Graphics, Co., Ltd and S3 Graphics, Inc. (collectively, “S3G”) motion to compel in Certain Electronic Devices With Graphics Data Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Associated Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-813
ITC issues article regarding increased use of Section 337 investigations by non-practicing entities
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 24 2012
The International Trade Commission (“ITC” or the “Commission”) recently issued an article (dated June 18, 2012) highlighting the dramatic increase in the agency’s Section 337 caseload from FY 2000 to 2011, and providing detailed statistics regarding the use of Section 337 investigations by non-practicing entities (“NPEs”
ALJ Shaw denies motion to postpone evidentiary hearing in certain microprocessors (337-TA-781)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 13 2012
On June 12, 2012, ALJ David P. Shaw issued Order No. 34 in Certain Microprocessors, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-781
Nokia files new 337 complaint regarding certain electronic devices, including mobile phones and tablet computers
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 3 2012
On May 2, 2012, Nokia Corporation of Finland, Nokia Inc. of Sunnyvale, California, and Intellisync Corporation of Sunnyvale, California (collectively, “Nokia”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337
ALJ Rogers denies motion to disqualify in certain light-emitting diodes (337-TA-798)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 2 2012
On April 27, 2012, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. issued the public version of Order No. 19 (dated January 26, 2012) denying Complainant Samsung LED Co., Ltd.’s motion to disqualify Respondents OSRAM AG, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc., and OSRAM Sylvania Inc.’s expert witness, Dr. Wetzel, and bar his access to confidential business information in Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-798
ALJ Pender issues claim construction order in Certain Electronic Devices With Communication Capabilities (337-TA-808)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 20 2012
On June 18, 2012, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued Order No. 16 construing terms of the asserted patent claims in Certain Electronic Devices With Communication Capabilities, Components Thereof, and Related Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-808
