We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 39

ALJ Shaw denies motions for summary determination in Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities (337-TA-800)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2013

On March 21, 2013, ALJ David P. Shaw issued the public versions of Order Nos. 92, 93, and 99 in Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities and

ALJ Shaw denies motion to postpone evidentiary hearing in certain microprocessors (337-TA-781)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 13 2012

On June 12, 2012, ALJ David P. Shaw issued Order No. 34 in Certain Microprocessors, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-781

Lamina packaging files new 337 complaint regarding Certain Laminated Packaging Products

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 21 2013

On February 20, 2013, Lamina Packaging Innovations LLC of Longview, Texas ("Lamina") filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an

ITC issues public version of opinion finding no violation of Section 337 in Certain Semiconductor Chips (337-TA-753)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 24 2012

Further to our July 27, 2012 post, on August 17, 2012, the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) issued the public version of its opinion finding no violation of Section 337 in Certain Semiconductor Chips and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-753

Nokia files new 337 complaint regarding certain electronic devices, including mobile phones and tablet computers

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2012

On May 2, 2012, Nokia Corporation of Finland, Nokia Inc. of Sunnyvale, California, and Intellisync Corporation of Sunnyvale, California (collectively, “Nokia”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337

ALJ Gildea grants amended motion to terminate and to stay the proceedings in Certain Sleep-Disordered Breathing Treatment Systems (337-TA-879)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2013

On July 17, 2013, ALJ E. James Gildea issued Order No. 11 granting Respondents Apex Medical Corp. and Apex Medical USA Corp.'s (collectively, "Apex"

ALJ Bullock denies motion to amend protective order in certain products containing interactive program guide and parental controls technology (337-TA-820)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 25 2012

On June 19, 2012, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued the public version of Order No. 20 (dated May 24, 2012) denying Respondent VIZIO, Inc.’s motion to amend the protective order to include a prosecution bar in Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Controls Technology (Inv. No. 337-TA-820

ALJ Pender rules on motions for summary determination in Certain Cases For Portable Electronic Devices (337-TA-861867)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 30 2013

On October 17, 2013, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued the public version of Order Nos. 15 and 16 (dated September 10, 2013 and September 17, 2013

ALJ Pender issues claim construction order in Certain Electronic Devices With Communication Capabilities (337-TA-808)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 20 2012

On June 18, 2012, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued Order No. 16 construing terms of the asserted patent claims in Certain Electronic Devices With Communication Capabilities, Components Thereof, and Related Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-808

ALJ Gildea denies motion to disqualify counsel in certain dynamic random access memory and nand flash memory devices (337-TA-803)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 8 2012

On June 5, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 40 (dated April 18, 2012) denying Respondents’ motion to disqualify a law firm as counsel for Complainants in Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory and NAND Flash Memory Devices and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-803