Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 23
ALJ Bullock issues public version of remand determination finding no violation of Section 337 in Certain Automated Media Library Devices (337-TA-746)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 29 2013
On April 23, 2013, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued the public version of the Remand Initial Determination (the "Remand ID") (dated March 26
ALJ Essex grants-in-part motion for protective order limiting e-discovery in certain electronic imaging devices (337-TA-850)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- November 26 2012
On November 19, 2012, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued Order No. 12 granting-in-part Complainant FlashPoint Technology, Inc.’s (“FlashPoint”) motion for a protective order to limit the discovery of electronically stored information in Certain Electronic Imaging Devices (Inv. No. 337-TA-850
ITC issues opinion in certain video game systems (337-TA-770)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- November 12 2012
On November 6, 2012, the International Trade Commission issued an opinion in Certain Video Game Systems and Wireless Controllers and Components Thereof (337-TA-770) construing the term “toy wand” and remanding the case to Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock to determine infringement in light of the Commission’s construction
ALJ Shaw denies motions for summary determination in Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities (337-TA-800)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 1 2013
On March 21, 2013, ALJ David P. Shaw issued the public versions of Order Nos. 92, 93, and 99 in Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities and
Lamina packaging files new 337 complaint regarding Certain Laminated Packaging Products
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- February 21 2013
On February 20, 2013, Lamina Packaging Innovations LLC of Longview, Texas ("Lamina") filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an
Did you knowParties may request a shortened period during which opposition motions may be filed?
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 11 2012
Investigations at the ITC already move very quickly, but did you know that the parties can make investigations move even more rapidly?
ALJ Bullock issues claim construction order in certain digital televisions and components thereof (337-TA-806)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 19 2012
On April 13, 2012, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued Order No. 6 construing certain terms of the asserted claims in Certain Digital Televisions and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-806
ALJ Shaw denies motion to postpone evidentiary hearing in certain microprocessors (337-TA-781)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 13 2012
On June 12, 2012, ALJ David P. Shaw issued Order No. 34 in Certain Microprocessors, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-781
Nokia files new 337 complaint regarding certain electronic devices, including mobile phones and tablet computers
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 3 2012
On May 2, 2012, Nokia Corporation of Finland, Nokia Inc. of Sunnyvale, California, and Intellisync Corporation of Sunnyvale, California (collectively, “Nokia”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337
ALJ Rogers denies motion to disqualify in certain light-emitting diodes (337-TA-798)
- Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 2 2012
On April 27, 2012, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. issued the public version of Order No. 19 (dated January 26, 2012) denying Complainant Samsung LED Co., Ltd.’s motion to disqualify Respondents OSRAM AG, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc., and OSRAM Sylvania Inc.’s expert witness, Dr. Wetzel, and bar his access to confidential business information in Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-798
