Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 25

ITC affirms ALJ Bullock’s finding of no violation of Section 337 in Certain Static Random Access Memories (337-TA-792)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
June 13 2013

On June 7, 2013, the International Trade Commission ("the Commission") issued a notice in Certain Static Random Access Memories and Products

ITC decides to review remand initial determination in Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices (337-TA-796)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
May 31 2013

On May 28, 2013, the International Trade Commission ("the Commission") issued a notice in Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components

ALJ Bullock grants motion to quash subpoena in certain wiper blades (337-TA-816)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
October 3 2012

On September 26, 2012, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued the public version of Order No. 49 (dated September 11, 2012) granting non-party Jeffrey S. Ginsberg’s motion to quash Respondents’ subpoena ad testificandum in Certain Wiper Blades (Inv. No. 337-TA-816

ALJ Rogers denies motion to disqualify in certain light-emitting diodes (337-TA-798)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
May 2 2012

On April 27, 2012, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. issued the public version of Order No. 19 (dated January 26, 2012) denying Complainant Samsung LED Co., Ltd.’s motion to disqualify Respondents OSRAM AG, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc., and OSRAM Sylvania Inc.’s expert witness, Dr. Wetzel, and bar his access to confidential business information in Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-798

Lamina packaging files new 337 complaint regarding Certain Laminated Packaging Products

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
February 21 2013

On February 20, 2013, Lamina Packaging Innovations LLC of Longview, Texas ("Lamina") filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an

Did you knowParties may request a shortened period during which opposition motions may be filed?

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
April 11 2012

Investigations at the ITC already move very quickly, but did you know that the parties can make investigations move even more rapidly?

ALJ Bullock issues claim construction order in certain digital televisions and components thereof (337-TA-806)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
April 19 2012

On April 13, 2012, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued Order No. 6 construing certain terms of the asserted claims in Certain Digital Televisions and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-806

ALJ Pender issues public version of initial determination finding a violation of Section 337 in Certain Wireless Communication Devices (337-TA-745)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
May 31 2012

On May 16, 2012, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued the public version of the Initial Determination (“ID”) (dated April 24, 2012) in Certain Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, Computers, and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-745

ALJ Gildea rules on motion to compel in Certain Electronic Devices with Graphics Data Processing Systems (337-TA-813)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
April 27 2012

On April 20, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 12 (dated April 9, 2012) denying Complainants’ S3 Graphics, Co., Ltd and S3 Graphics, Inc. (collectively, “S3G”) motion to compel in Certain Electronic Devices With Graphics Data Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Associated Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-813

ALJ Gildea denies motion to strike in Certain Equipment for Communications Networks (337-TA-778)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
March 14 2012

On March 7, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued Order No. 34 denying Complainant MOSAID Technologies Inc.’s (“MOSAID”) motion to strike Respondents’ exhibit objections, and ordered MOSAID to show cause as to why it should not be sanctioned for filing its motion in Certain Equipment for Communications Networks, Including Switches, Routers, Gateways, Bridges, Wireless Access Points, Cable Modems, IP Phones, and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-778

next >