We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Australian carbon tax plan expected to become law

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Australia, Canada
  • -
  • October 19 2011

On this blog we will regularly provide you with information on Canadian and international developments in the regulation of carbon and the creation of carbon trading and taxing regimes

International round-up: climate change measures developing in 2012

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Australia, Canada, China, European Union, New Zealand, USA
  • -
  • January 31 2012

The past year was an eventful period in the area of emissions trading and climate change regulation and policy development and 2012 is showing no signs of slowing down

Novel costs award in trial of first buyer-side conspiracy claim for damages in Canada

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 2 2012

The Court of Queen’s Bench in Alberta has recently ruled in 321665 Alberta Ltd. v. ExxonMobil Canada Ltd, 2012 ABQB 76 on several issues relating to costs under section 36 of the Competition Act

Ottawa wouldn't block foreign takeover of RIM

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 17 2012

On March 30, 2012, Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said his government would not block a foreign takeover of Research In Motion, and RIM would be the master of its own destiny

Competition Bureau releases additional pre-merger interpretation guideline for consultation

  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 16 2012

Competition Bureau has published a draft new Pre-Merger Interpretation Guideline for public consultation, providing details as to how the Bureau calculates the value of “assets in Canada” and “gross revenues from sales” for purposes of the merger notification thresholds