We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 293

OEHHA extends comment period on hazard ID materials related to BPA listing under Prop. 65

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 13 2015

The California Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has extended the deadline for public

Prop. 65 lead testing can use average exposures, appeals court confirms

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 20 2015

A California appeals court has affirmed a lower court's ruling against plaintiff Environmental Law Foundation (ELF), which alleged that the products

Complaint alleges Xymogen’s supplements contain lead

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2014

Public interest group Environmental Research Center (ERC) has sought civil penalties and an injunction against nutritional supplement manufacturer

CalEPA launches new effort to list styrene under Prop. 65

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 6 2015

The California Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has announced its intent to list styrene as

Attorney chastised in contaminated GE rice litigation

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 22 2011

A federal judge in Missouri has reprimanded a plaintiffs’ attorney involved in the genetically engineered (GE) rice multidistrict litigation for sending “false and misleading” letters about a recent settlement with Bayer CropScience “to landlords who were either unrepresented or who were represented by other counsel.”

OEHHA adds pulegone to Prop. 65 list

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2014

California EPA 's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has added pulegone to its list of chemicals known to the state to cause

Groups sue EPA for alleged failure to regulate novel nanotechnology pesticide products

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 19 2014

Several consumer and environmental groups, including the Center for Food Safety and Center for Environmental Health, have filed a lawsuit against the

OEHHA announces meeting to discuss BPA listing under Prop. 65

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 20 2015

The California Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has announced a May 7, 2015, meeting of its

California lists BPA as reproductive toxicant under Prop. 65

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 12 2013

California EPA's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has added bisphenol A (BPA) to the "list of chemicals known to the State to

Industry takes aim at draft UCSF report on nanomaterial regulation in California

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 10 2010

Concerned about regulatory coordination issues, the omission of new environmental data and an apparent failure to recognize collaborative stakeholder efforts, nanotech industry interests have reportedly urged CalEPA's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and researchers with the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) to revise a draft April 2010 report on nanomaterial regulation