We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 67

Developments in intercarrier compensation

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 8 2010

On February 25, 2010, Qwest Corp. filed a seven-count complaint in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas against Broadvox, Inc. seeking recovery of unpaid access charges

In the courts

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 24 2010

On May 13, 2010, the US District Court for the Southern District of California granted in part and denied in part Verizon Wireless's motion to dismiss a consumer's complaint challenging its practice of charging sales tax on the full retail price of telephones, rather than the actual price paid by the consumer

In the courts

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2010

On March 22, 2010, the US District Court for the District of Arizona dismissed Eschelon's cross-claim against the Arizona Corporation Commission relating to its ruling that Qwest may charge $200 per day for non-emergency expedited requests for unbundled loops

In the courts

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2010

On May 3, 2010, the United States District Court for the District of Arizona dismissed, without prejudice, a suit by North County Communications seeking tariffed charges for terminating traffic received from CLECs McLeod USA Telecommunications Services, Cox Arizona Telcom, and Electric Lightwave

Federal Trade Commission (FTC) developments

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 24 2010

The FTC announced that it has settled its federal case against Diamond Phone Card., Inc., a calling card company

In the courts

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 17 2010

On May 10, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed two district court orders dismissing separate complaints brought against T-Mobile USA, Inc. challenging the carrier’s practice of billing customers both a Universal Service Fund fee and a Regulatory Programs Fee

Developments in intercarrier compensation

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2010

On April 26, 2009, the staff of the Illinois Commerce Commission recommended denial of the motion of AT&T-Illinois to dismiss Cbeyond Communications, LLC's complaint

In the courts

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2010

On February 23, 2010, the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed a Michigan district court's vacatur of the Michigan Public Service Commission's ruling that ILECs must offer entrance facilities to CLECs at Total Element Long-Run Incremental Cost (TELRIC) prices

In the courts

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 12 2010

On September 30, 2010, the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina granted summary judgment in favor of certain rural local exchange carriers ("RLECs") against the challenge lodged by AT&T Mobility and Alltel Communications against a North Carolina Utility Commission (NCUC) arbitration decision arising out of the RLECs' 2005 demand for interconnection and reciprocal compensation rates

In the courts

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 2 2010

On July 23, 2010, the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana resolved motions for summary judgment in the last surviving case that made up the In re AT&T Corporation Fiber Optic Cable Installation multi-district litigation