We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 130

Developments in intercarrier compensation

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 23 2012

On January 17, 2011, the Missouri Public Service Commission (MO PSC) granted the motion of several rural local exchange carriers (RLECs) to reactivate their petition against Halo Wireless, Inc. and AT&T Missouri

Developments in intercarrier compensation

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 7 2013

On December 28, 2012, YMax Communications Corp. withdrew proposed revisions to its intrastate switched access tariff on file with the Iowa Utilities

Developments in intercarrier compensation

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 21 2011

On February 14, 2011, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) issued an amended scheduling order in a complaint case filed by Qwest Communications Company, LLC against Tekstar Communications, Inc

Developments in intercarrier compensation

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 11 2011

On April 4, 2011, the Mississippi Public Service Commission (PSC) and a dozen Mississippi rural LECs appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from a Mississippi federal court order reversing the PSC's finding that Total Element Long Run Incremental Cost (TELRIC) pricing is not required for the rural LECs' arbitrated reciprocal compensation rates for traffic exchanged with AT&T Mobility

Developments in intercarrier compensation

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2011

On May 13, 2011, several wireless carriers filed a joint response opposing the Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. Application for Rehearing of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) decision dismissing Pac-West’s complaints against several wireless carriers without prejudice

In the courts

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 25 2011

On April 19, 2011, the US District Court for the District of New Hampshire denied AT&T Mobility's appeal from the Town of Candia's denial of a for a variance to build a 120-foot or 150-foot monopole tower

Developments in intercarrier compensation

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 14 2011

On March 7, 2011, Verizon and the Voice on the Net Coalition (VON) filed comments with the Iowa Utilities Board expressing their "vigorous disagreement" with the Office of Consumer Advocate's legal analysis in a complaint brought by MCC Telephony of Iowa LLC and MCC Iowa LLC, dba Mediacom, against Connexion Technologies and Primecast

In the courts

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 14 2011

On March 8, 2011, the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed, in part, a Michigan federal trial court's denial of a challenge by CMC Telecom, a competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC), to a Michigan PUC ruling that AT&T Michigan did not violate the Telecommunications Act by refusing to disclose individualized resale contracts to CMC

Developments in intercarrier compensation

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 21 2011

On March 14, 2011, Verizon Business and Verizon Florida LLC filed a motion with the Florida Public Service Commission to dismiss or stay the complaint of Bright House Networks Information Services, LLC

Developments in intercarrier compensation

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2011

On May 9, 2010, the Committee on Utilities and Commerce of the California Assembly will vote on proposed legislation that would bar the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) from imposing any regulation on Voice-over-Internet-Protocol (VoIP) providers with the exception of requiring such providers to contribute to the state universal service fund (USF