We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 254

Court grants order adding inventor

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 4 2014

The Applicant, Dr. Falk Pharma GMBH sought an order pursuant to s. 52 of the Patent Act to vary inventorship on a patent. The Application was

S. 8 case not struck, despite prohibition order having issued in underlying s. 6 proceeding

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 4 2014

In this case, the Prothonotary refused to strike a Statement of Claim brought pursuant to s. 8 of the NOC Regulations, and this decision was upheld

Pleadings amendment re s. 53 allowed trial judge to determine materiality of inventors names

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 4 2014

Idenix brought a motion to amend its pleadings. The Prothonotary granted leave to make certain amendments, however denied leave to make certain

Documents included in joint book for trial should be exhibits for appeal

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 11 2012

The issue to be determined relates to the contents of the appeal books

Patent refused listing on the Patent Register

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 30 2012

The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a decision of the Minister of Health refusing to list a patent on the Patent Register

NOC proceeding dismissed on the basis of overbreadth and a lack of sound prediction

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 13 2013

In this case, one claim of a patent was at issue in the proceeding. The claim related to the use of pregabalin or its racemate to treat pain. The

Claim to disgorgement of profits denied by Ontario Court of Appeal

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 18 2013

Apotex appealed in the Ontario Court of Appeal from a partial summary judgment that dismissed its unjust enrichment claim for the disgorgement of the

Appeal of prohibition order dismissed

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • October 21 2013

The Federal Court issued an order prohibiting Teva from entering the market with its version of zoledronic acid until the expiration of two patents

No vested interest in NOC while on patent hold

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • November 28 2011

Apotex brought a judicial review application, challenging three decisions made by the Minister of Health (Minister) with respect to Apotex’ submission for approval of its Apo-omeprazole product

Court of Appeal dismisses appeal of judicial review of the minister’s decision refusing to issue notice of compliance

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 21 2011

Apotex filed an ANDS seeking a Notice of Compliance (NOC) for its Apo-ASA product