We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

High Court of England and Wales rules on threats and jurisdiction in declaration for non-infringement

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 30 2012

In Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd and others v Apple Inc 2012 EWHC 889 (Ch), the High Court of England and Wales considered several preliminary issues in a case involving Apple’s registered Community design for a tablet computer

Court of Appeal of England and Wales considers “best” and “all reasonable” endeavours

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 30 2012

The Court of Appeal of England and Wales in Jet2.com Limited v Blackpool Airport Limited 2011 EWHC 1529 (Comm) has provided guidance on the enforceability of “best endeavours” and “all reasonable endeavours” clauses

The High Court of England and Wales rules on Formula One confidentiality and copyright infringement

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 30 2012

In Force India Formula One Team Ltd v 1 Malaysia Racing Team SDN BHD and others 2012 EWHC 616 (Ch), the High Court of England and Wales ruled on claims for contractual and equitable breach of confidence and copyright infringement brought by one Formula One (F1) race team operator against another

Drug formulation patent found to be invalid in the United Kingdom but valid in other jurisdictions

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 30 2012

Mr Justice Arnold’s decision in Teva and others v Astrazeneca AB 2012 EWHC 655 (Pat) invalidated Astrazeneca’s patent for a sustained release formulation of the anti-psychotic drug quetiapine in the United Kingdom, on the grounds of obviousness, just days after the same patent was found to be valid in the Netherlands