We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 410

Court denies Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss on statute of limitations grounds

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2010

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently granted in part and denied in part motions to dismiss a class action brought by a class of purchasers of mortgage pass-through certificates

Second Circuit: distinguishing between policy definitions subject to NY Insurance Law 3420(d)(2)’s timely disclaimer requirement as an exclusion and those that are not

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 16 2010

In a decision issued on February 1, 2010, the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit confirmed that under New York law some policy provisions, although placed outside of the policy's "Exclusions" section, may nonetheless be considered an exclusion and, therefore, subject to the timely disclaimer and denial requirement of NY Insurance Law 3420(d)(2

First Circuit: no coverage under claims made and reported policy if insured fails to report claim within policy period

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2009

The First Circuit recently held that an insured was not entitled to coverage under a Professional Liability claims made and reported policy where the claim is not both made against the insured and reported to the insurer within the policy period

Eleventh Circuit upholds that D&O policy does not provide coverage for claims arising out of property damage under Florida law

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 22 2010

In an unpublished opinion, the Eleventh Circuit recently affirmed the trial court's decision that a D&O policy does not provide coverage for third-party property damage claims

Mississippi new data breach notification law

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2010

Mississippi is the latest state to adopt a data breach notification statute under House Bill 583

Lloyds TSB Bank settles with OFAC

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 23 2009

On December 22, 2009, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced the settlement of apparent violations by Lloyds TSB Bank of OFAC regulations relating to Iran, Sudan and Libya

New York contemplates disclosure for excess annuity withdrawals

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 30 2010

The New York Insurance Department ("NYID") prepared a draft circular letter ("Draft Circular Letter" or "Letter") in early June, which, if finalized and issued, will require insurers to advise consumers of the implications of excess withdrawals from annuities with guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits ("GMWB"

Texas moves closer to banning use of discretionary clauses in insurance contracts

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 1 2010

The Texas Department of Insurance (“TDI”) has officially proposed regulations banning the use of discretionary clauses in insurance contracts

Pennsylvania federal court dismisses bad faith claim as subsumed by breach of contract claim, but allows statutory bad faith claim

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2010

Recently, a Pennsylvania federal court dismissed a bad faith claim against an insurer on the grounds that the claim was subsumed by the plaintiff's breach of contract claim in the same proceeding

Georgia Federal District Court finds that hot tub water is “intended for bodily consumption”

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 11 2009

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia recently held that an insurer had a duty to defend under a CGL policy and umbrella policy against claims relating to a hotel guest’s alleged contraction of Legionnaire’s Disease from a dirty hot tub