On March 5, 2012, ALJ Rogers issued an order denying complainant Kaneka Corporation’s motion to quash the subpoena ad testificandum issued to E.I. DuPont DeNemours and Company in Inv. No. 337-TA-772, Certain Polymide Films, Products Containing Same and Related Methods. Kaneka lacked standing to quash the subpoena because it failed to demonstrate a personal right or privilege with respect to the subject matter of the testimony of the non-party DuPont witness. ALJ Rodgers also permitted respondents SKC Kolon PI, Inc. and SKC, Inc. (collectively “SKC”) to update their pre-hearing statement to add the DuPont witness. He further allowed SKC to present live testimony of the DuPont witness at the hearing without violating Ground Rule 9.3, if the witness refused to sit for a witness statement.
Register Now As you are not an existing subscriber please register for your free daily legal newsfeed service.
RegisterIf you have any questions about the service please contact customerservices@lexology.com or call Lexology Customer Services on +44 20 7234 0606.
ALJ Rogers denies motion to quash a subpoena issued to non-party dupont and permits complainant to present live testimony of DuPont witness
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Blair M. Jacobs, Robert J. Walters, Christopher L. May and Christina A. Ondrick
- USA
- March 5 2012
-
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at ateague@lexology.com.
Nadia Martel
Senior Legal Counsel
Bombardier Recreational Products Inc
