StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. v. PhoneFactor, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 13-490 – RGA-MPT, November 9, 2015.

Thynge, C.M.J. Plaintiff’s request for claim interpretation is denied. The stay ordered on June 10, 2015 is lifted.

Plaintiff requests interpretation of two words used to construe claim terms: “isolation” and “facilities.” Plaintiff’s argument that the court overruled previous claim construction is wrong. Plaintiff’s objections were overruled and the constructions adopted. Plaintiff’s motion is akin to a motion for reargument.  Having filed objections plaintiff is now barred by 7.1.5(a) from reargument by either a magistrate judge or a district court judge.