On 21 June 2012, Advocate General Bot gave an opinion on E.ON’s appeal against a General Court judgment which upheld the European Commission’s decision to fine E.ON €38m for breaking a seal during a Commission investigation. The Advocate General disagreed with the General Court on E.ON’s final plea where E.ON alleged that the General Court failed to adopt the principle of proportionality in calculating the level of the fine, and had failed to regard mitigating factors. In particular, the Advocate General found that the General Court did not carry out a proper assessment of the level of fine imposed on E.ON, and there was no clear-cut calculation of the fine imposed on E.ON. In addition, the General Court failed to take into consideration the mitigating factor that E.ON’s act was one of negligence, not intention.
Register Now As you are not an existing subscriber please register for your free daily legal newsfeed service.Register
If you have any questions about the service please contact email@example.com or call Lexology Customer Services on +44 20 7234 0606.
Dawn raid obstruction
- Hogan Lovells
- European Union
- July 31 2012
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Director, Legal Services
Cisco Systems, Inc