Real estate agency franchisor Ray White has given the ACCC court enforceable undertakings following a suspected breach of the Franchising Code of Conduct.
Ray White provides undertakings following likely breach of Franchising Code
Popular related articles
-
The genie is back in the bottle: High Court decides that ‘terms’ means ‘terms’ (Freehills)
The High Court of Australia has unanimously dismissed the appeal by Public Trustee of Queensland against the Queensland Court of Appeal’s judgment in Re Octaviar Ltd (No 7) [2009] QCA 282 (the Court of Appeal Decision).
-
Did you know ... how to properly execute a legal document? (Clayton Utz)
They're the backbone of energy and resources transactions, but the mechanics of properly executing a legal document are often overlooked as "mere formalities".
-
Newspaper headlines not protected by copyright (Freehills)
Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (Fairfax)'s action against Reed International Books Australia Pty Ltd (Reed) for infringement of copyright in newspaper article headlines has been dismissed by the Federal Court of Australia.
-
“Some job better than no job?” (MARQUE Lawyers)
An employer has been stung for $25,000 for failing to redeploy a redundant employee.
-
The modernisation of international commercial arbitration (Freehills)
In recent decades, we have seen a dramatic increase in the volume of international trade and commerce.
-
Transfer of undertaking provisions: outsourcing and franchise arrangements (ENS - Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs)
Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act sets down transfer of undertaking provisions similar to those set out in the UK Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006.
-
Missouri court decision denies lost future royalties claim by franchisor (Armstrong Teasdale LLP)
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri recently issued an opinion that could potentially have adverse implications for franchisors seeking future license fees upon early termination of a franchise agreement.
-
Restrictive covenant in franchise agreement does not breach competition law (Nabarro LLP)
The High Court dismissed a competition defence against the alleged breach of a restrictive covenant in a franchise agreement in Pirtek (UK) Limited v Joinplace Limited, on 7 July 2010.
-
Restraints of trade in franchise agreements (Piper Alderman)
On 13 August 2009, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland dismissed a franchisor’s application for an injunction to enforce restraint of trade provisions pursuant to a franchise agreement.
-
New Brunswick joins other provinces with franchise legislation (Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP)
The grant of franchises in the Province of New Brunswick will be subject to regulation in early 2011, joining the Provinces of Ontario, Alberta and Prince Edward Island with pre-sale disclosure legislation in Canada.
-
Non-disclosure agreements - avoiding a damages claim (Mills & Reeve LLP)
A recent Privy Council case serves as a reminder that businesses may be able to claim compensation for breach of a non-disclosure agreement even if they cannot show any demonstrable loss.
-
Discipline based on emplyees' (mis)use of social media on the rise (Prince Lobel Glovsky & Tye LLP)
In a case that has garnered national attention, a medical technician at a Michigan hospital was fired in July 2010 for a posting on her Facebook page.
-
The genie is back in the bottle: High Court decides that ‘terms’ means ‘terms’ (Freehills)
The High Court of Australia has unanimously dismissed the appeal by Public Trustee of Queensland against the Queensland Court of Appeal’s judgment in Re Octaviar Ltd (No 7) [2009] QCA 282 (the Court of Appeal Decision).
-
Leave of absence as reasonable accommodation (Jackson Lewis LLP)
When does the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) require employers to allow their employees to take large “blocks” of leave, i.e., consecutive weeks or months of unpaid time off, and modify their standard leave policies, as a reasonable accommodation to claims of illness or injury?
-
Perpetual licences are not forever (Mills & Reeve LLP)
The High Court holds that "perpetual" licences are, unlike diamonds, not necessarily forever.
-
French law - no trust means no benefits (DMH Stallard LLP)
A recent case illustrates the sort of unanticipated problem that can arise as a result of owning property abroad.
-
Developer-2, purchaser-0 (MacRoberts LLP)
Following our e-update on 17 August discussing Malcolm Snowie (and others) v Museum Hall LLP - "Developer-1, Purchaser-0; another failed attempt to avoid completion" , a sheriff court decision of 27 August rejected another (inventive) attempt by a purchaser to resile.
-
Lender considerations when GSA is a tenant (McGuireWoods LLP)
When a lender considers foreclosure or exercising its rights to receive an assignment of the rents on a commercial property with traditional tenants, the following checklist for pre-foreclosure due diligence is fairly standard.
-
New discrimination provisions (Mills & Reeve LLP)
The main provisions of the Equality Act 2010 are due to come into force in October of this year.
-
Advice finds planning consultant guilty of environmental offence (Blake Dawson)
A planning consultant and his company have been found guilty of giving advice that led to the destruction of the habitat of a threatened species, the koala.
-
Inside information and information generally known (Blake Dawson)
A recent case, Catena v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (No 2) [2010] FCA 865, illustrates the difference between inside information and information generally known to the market.
-
Deadlock in a 50:50 owned company (Blake Dawson)
A recent case illustrates why a deadlock-breaking clause with a buyout mechanism may be important in a corporate joint venture.
-
Facebook places location service - privacy concerns (Blake Dawson)
Facebook has again attracted attention and concerns about privacy in the social network.
-
ASIC publishes regulatory guide on insolvent trading (Blake Dawson)
ASIC has issued a final guide to directors on the steps that they should be taking in order to comply with their duty to prevent insolvent trading by the companies to which they are appointed.
-
Insider who invests in company fails in claim that he was misled (Blake Dawson)
An adviser of a private company with intimate knowledge of its affairs over a long period accepted an invitation to invest in the company.
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at ateague@lexology.com.