The U.S. Supreme Court held, in City of Ontario v. Quon, that a government employer's examination of an employee's pager messages did not violate the Fourth Amendment because it was justified by a "legitimate work-related rationale" and was "not excessively intrusive."
Register Now As you are not an existing subscriber please register for your free daily legal newsfeed service.Register
If you have any questions about the service please contact email@example.com or call Lexology Customer Services on +44 20 7234 0606.
Supreme Court first ducks, then addresses, issue of employees' expectation of privacy in workplace communications
To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader.
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at firstname.lastname@example.org.