On March 6, 2012, ALJ Essex denied the Trek Complainants’ motion for leave to supplement their opening infringement expert report. Trek contended that the Commission’s recent decision in Certain Electronic Devices with Image Processing System, Components Thereof, and Associated Hardware, Inv. 337-TA-724, changed the law and provided good cause for the supplementation. ALJ Essex determined that the proposed supplementation concerned contributory infringement and Electronic Devices did not change the law on contributory infringement. As a result, ALJ Essex found that good cause did not exist to permit supplementation.
Register Now As you are not an existing subscriber please register for your free daily legal newsfeed service.
RegisterIf you have any questions about the service please contact customerservices@lexology.com or call Lexology Customer Services on +44 20 7234 0606.
ALJ Essex denies motion to supplement expert report
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Blair M. Jacobs, Robert J. Walters, Christopher L. May and Christina A. Ondrick
- USA
- March 6 2012
-
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at ateague@lexology.com.
![]()
Edward J. Willey III
Corporate Counsel
Huawei Technologies (USA)
