Disclosures to government regulators have always posed risks to trade secrets and other proprietary information.
Secrets easily leaked by friend or foe in publicly filed .PDF documents
Popular related articles
-
Circular beach towel's trademark is invalid (Kelley Drye & Warren LLP)
In the late 1980s, Clemens Franek sought and received trademark registration status for his "radical" round beach towel.
-
Western District of New York upholds non-compete and grants TRO (Seyfarth Shaw LLP)
Plaintiff IDG USA, LLC (“IDG”), a Georgia company with its principal place of business in North Carolina, commenced an action against a former employee, Kevin J. Schupp (“Schupp”), a New York resident, alleging breaches of a Non-Compete Agreement, breach of a Confidentiality Agreement, unfair competition, and theft of trade secrets.
-
Shutting down corporate pick-pockets (Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP)
A 10-year employee accounting manager systematically transfers amounts via ACH to her personal checking account.
-
Employer wins “cat's paw” case (Foley & Lardner LLP)
On August 11, 2010, a federal court rejected a terminated employee's "cat's paw" argument.
-
Massachusetts personnel records statute amended to require employers to notify employees when negative information is placed in personnel records (Goodwin Procter LLP)
Massachusetts recently enacted an economic development statute which contains an important amendment to the Massachusetts Personnel Records Statute, G.L. c. 149, § 52C.
-
Online ad network sued over tracking using flash cookies (Hunton & Williams LLP)
On August 18, 2010, a complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that Specific Media, Inc. violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, as well as state privacy and computer security laws, by failing to provide adequate notice regarding its online tracking practices.
-
Information Commissioner offers guidance on school photos (Mills & Reeve LLP)
The Information Commissioner has recently issued guidance, specifically aimed at Local Education Authorities and those working within the education sector, addressing the confusion surrounding the taking of photographs and videos in educational institutions.
-
ID scanning and privacy issues: new guidelines (Blake Dawson)
Increasingly, clubs and pubs are using technology to electronically capture identity information about their customers.
-
HHS releases proposed changes to HIPAA privacy, security and enforcement rules (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC)
On July 14, 2010, Secretary Kathleen Sebelius of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published notice in the Federal Register of proposed rulemaking1 aimed at "strengthening" the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) privacy, security and enforcement regulations (collectively referred to as the "HIPAA Rules") and as required by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act), which was enacted as a part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
-
How secure is your customer data? (MacRoberts LLP)
The Financial Services Authority ("FSA") has imposed a fine of £2.27 million on the UK branch of insurance company Zurich for loss of customer data.
-
Circular beach towel's trademark is invalid (Kelley Drye & Warren LLP)
In the late 1980s, Clemens Franek sought and received trademark registration status for his "radical" round beach towel.
-
Specsavers v ASDA - a real eye-opener? (Herbert Smith LLP)
The High Court has held that one of ASDA's marketing straplines used to promote its in-store optician took unfair advantage of Specsavers' Community Trade Marks (CTM) under Article 9(1)(c) of the CTM Regulation, but rejected its infringement claims made under Article 9(1)(b) and for passing-off.
-
Custom furniture: innovative plan or illegal imitation? (Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice PLLC)
Today's Wall Street Journal, San Francisco Bay Area edition, includes a very interesting article on start up furniture companies whose business model includes reproducing popular furniture designs on a custom basis.
-
Court of Justice rules on another AdWords case (Marks & Clerk)
In July, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled on the case Protakabin Ltd and Portakabin BV v Primakabin BV in the Netherlands, which involved use of registered trade marks as sponsored keywords.
-
Is your trade mark distinctive or just descriptive? (Clayton Utz)
Exotic Limo Pty Ltd applied to register ExoticLimo (stylised) for car hire and chauffeuring services.
-
Circular beach towel's trademark is invalid (Kelley Drye & Warren LLP)
In the late 1980s, Clemens Franek sought and received trademark registration status for his "radical" round beach towel.
-
Boundary dispute over strip of driveway ends up in court (DMH Stallard LLP)
An argument over a narrow strip of land has left a mother and son facing massive costs after their case was heard in the Court of Appeal recently.
-
Western District of New York upholds non-compete and grants TRO (Seyfarth Shaw LLP)
Plaintiff IDG USA, LLC (“IDG”), a Georgia company with its principal place of business in North Carolina, commenced an action against a former employee, Kevin J. Schupp (“Schupp”), a New York resident, alleging breaches of a Non-Compete Agreement, breach of a Confidentiality Agreement, unfair competition, and theft of trade secrets.
-
The Court of Appeal provides guidance on the rules on equitable set-off; Geldof Metaalconstructie NV v Simon Carves Ltd (2010) (Mills & Reeve LLP)
Set-off effectively allows one person to deduct from sums he owes to another, amounts that the other person owes to him.
-
Specsavers v ASDA - a real eye-opener? (Herbert Smith LLP)
The High Court has held that one of ASDA's marketing straplines used to promote its in-store optician took unfair advantage of Specsavers' Community Trade Marks (CTM) under Article 9(1)(c) of the CTM Regulation, but rejected its infringement claims made under Article 9(1)(b) and for passing-off.
-
Barbie vs. Bratz provides key guidance regarding invention assignment agreements (Fenwick & West LLP)
The intellectual property ownership issues in Mattel v MGA Entertainment, Inc provide important lessons regarding the scope and interpretation of employment invention assignment agreements.
-
Miller v. Facebook, Inc.: copyright infringement claim dismissed (Fenwick & West LLP)
In March, the US District Court for the Northern District of California granted Facebook's motion to dismiss a copyright infringement claim brought by Daniel M Miller, the creator of an online video game called Boomshine.
-
Everything must end eventually: the Fifth Circuit buries Leegin; epic vertical price fixing case is over (Fenwick & West LLP)
In its second encounter with PSKS, Inc v Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on August 17, 2010 affirmed the dismissal on the pleadings of the plaintiff's antitrust claims for vertical minimum price fixing (aka resale price maintenance).
-
Employer had no duty to accommodate employee on prolonged leave who never requested accommodation or return to work (Fenwick & West LLP)
In Milan v. City of Holtville, a California court of appeal held that an employee on a lengthy workers' compensation leave cannot assert a failure to accommodate disability claim where the employee never requested an accommodation or otherwise indicated she wanted to continue working.
-
Protection or preemption? The Ninth Circuit rules on California contract law claims (Fenwick & West LLP)
In decisions released within one week of each other, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has affirmed that contractual protections for literary and artistic works can be upheld even if the requirements for a federal copyright claim are not met.
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at ateague@lexology.com.