On March 29, 2010, Judge Sweet of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York determined that isolated human genes and the comparison of their sequences are not patentable under the laws of the United States.
Life sciences patents dealt a significant blow
Popular related articles
-
Circular beach towel's trademark is invalid (Kelley Drye & Warren LLP)
In the late 1980s, Clemens Franek sought and received trademark registration status for his "radical" round beach towel.
-
Western District of New York upholds non-compete and grants TRO (Seyfarth Shaw LLP)
Plaintiff IDG USA, LLC (“IDG”), a Georgia company with its principal place of business in North Carolina, commenced an action against a former employee, Kevin J. Schupp (“Schupp”), a New York resident, alleging breaches of a Non-Compete Agreement, breach of a Confidentiality Agreement, unfair competition, and theft of trade secrets.
-
Shutting down corporate pick-pockets (Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP)
A 10-year employee accounting manager systematically transfers amounts via ACH to her personal checking account.
-
Employer wins “cat's paw” case (Foley & Lardner LLP)
On August 11, 2010, a federal court rejected a terminated employee's "cat's paw" argument.
-
Massachusetts personnel records statute amended to require employers to notify employees when negative information is placed in personnel records (Goodwin Procter LLP)
Massachusetts recently enacted an economic development statute which contains an important amendment to the Massachusetts Personnel Records Statute, G.L. c. 149, § 52C.
-
Employer wins “cat's paw” case (Foley & Lardner LLP)
On August 11, 2010, a federal court rejected a terminated employee's "cat's paw" argument.
-
HHS releases proposed changes to HIPAA privacy, security and enforcement rules (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC)
On July 14, 2010, Secretary Kathleen Sebelius of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published notice in the Federal Register of proposed rulemaking1 aimed at "strengthening" the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) privacy, security and enforcement regulations (collectively referred to as the "HIPAA Rules") and as required by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act), which was enacted as a part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
-
Health reform Q&A for employers - update (Baker & Daniels LLP)
In the last two months, the Department of Labor, the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Health and Human Services published three additional sets of interim final regulations to address compliance requirements in the first significant round of changes to impact group health plans under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).
-
Federal external review procedure for group health plans (Covington & Burling LLP)
The health reform law requires non-grandfathered group health plans to meet new standards for processing internal claims and appeals, and also requires these plans to implement a new external review procedure.
-
Health care reform — regulations issued on expanded internal/external claims review process for nongrandfathered group health plans (Hunton & Williams LLP)
On July 19, 2010, the United States Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury issued interim final regulations covering the mandates under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended (the "Health Care Reform Act"), relating to the internal and external claims review process.
-
Circular beach towel's trademark is invalid (Kelley Drye & Warren LLP)
In the late 1980s, Clemens Franek sought and received trademark registration status for his "radical" round beach towel.
-
Specsavers v ASDA - a real eye-opener? (Herbert Smith LLP)
The High Court has held that one of ASDA's marketing straplines used to promote its in-store optician took unfair advantage of Specsavers' Community Trade Marks (CTM) under Article 9(1)(c) of the CTM Regulation, but rejected its infringement claims made under Article 9(1)(b) and for passing-off.
-
Custom furniture: innovative plan or illegal imitation? (Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice PLLC)
Today's Wall Street Journal, San Francisco Bay Area edition, includes a very interesting article on start up furniture companies whose business model includes reproducing popular furniture designs on a custom basis.
-
Court of Justice rules on another AdWords case (Marks & Clerk)
In July, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled on the case Protakabin Ltd and Portakabin BV v Primakabin BV in the Netherlands, which involved use of registered trade marks as sponsored keywords.
-
Is your trade mark distinctive or just descriptive? (Clayton Utz)
Exotic Limo Pty Ltd applied to register ExoticLimo (stylised) for car hire and chauffeuring services.
-
SEC adopts rules requiring proxy access (Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP)
On August 25, 2010, the SEC adopted, by a partisan 3-2 vote, final rules on proxy access.
-
Lawsuit seeks overtime for time spent using BlackBerry (Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP)
It was only a matter of time.
-
Five steps to protect your business from being liable for your supplier’s or distributor’s environmental contamination (Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP)
We're often asked how a business can limit its liability exposure for the cost to clean up environmental contamination when entering into supplier/distributor agreements where it's possible, maybe even likely, that some environmental contamination will result from the supplier's manufacturing or distributor's handling of the product.
-
PPACA and market demands may trigger next generation of physician hospital integration (Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP)
Two Medicare payment reform provisions buried deep within the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("PPACA") may enhance already-existing market demands and trigger a wave of new legal structures to further integrate physicians and hospitals as well as other post-acute care providers and medical product suppliers.
-
EPA proposes CAIR replacement rule – the Transport Rule (Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP)
Furthering its use of the “good neighbor” provision, and its focus on coal-fired electric generating power plants, U.S. EPA recently proposed the Transport Rule.
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at ateague@lexology.com.