BBA has responded to FSA’s guidance consultation on banks’ controls on investment fraud. It was surprised by several aspects of FSA’s report, specifically that FSA found banks had no clear rationale for allocating resources to investment fraud. It commented that it is not feasible in some UK banks to dedicate a team solely to investment fraud and that many banks include it in their overall anti-financial crime programmes. It noted the report did not recognise the tensions banks face in applying legal requirements in the face of the expectations of technology, for example the faster payments initiative. It also commented that many reports of fraud are not investigated because of resource limitations in the enforcement agencies. BBA also expressed regret that FSA had not consulted with it in the course of drafting the guidance. (Source: BBA Responds on Investment Fraud Guidance)
Register Now As you are not an existing subscriber please register for your free daily legal newsfeed service.
RegisterIf you have any questions about the service please contact customerservices@lexology.com or call Lexology Customer Services on +44 20 7234 0606.
BBA responds on investment fraud guidance
- Dentons
- Emma Radmore and Andrew Barber
- United Kingdom
- August 31 2012
-
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at ateague@lexology.com.
Sonja Sarantis
Legal Counsel
State Street Bank and Trust Company