On January 3, 2012, Justice Eileen Bransten of the Supreme Court of the State of New York granted partial summary judgment to two insurers suing Countrywide Financial Corporation concerning the insurance of securitizations of mortgages underwritten by Countrywide. In the two cases, the insurers, MBIA and Syncora Guarantee, have brought claims for fraud and breach of the insurance agreements at issue. The Court found that to establish a claim of fraud the insurers must show that representations by Countrywide induced the insurers to issue insurance policies on terms to which they otherwise would not have agreed and that they are not required to establish a direct causal link between Countrywide's misrepresentations and the insurers' claims payments made pursuant to the insurers' policies at issue. The Court further held that the insurers may seek rescissory damages upon proving all elements of its claims for fraud and breach of representation and/or warranty. MBIA Decision. Syncora Decision.
Register Now As you are not an existing subscriber please register for your free daily legal newsfeed service.
RegisterIf you have any questions about the service please contact customerservices@lexology.com or call Lexology Customer Services on +44 20 7234 0606.
New York state court holds MBS insurers need not prove causal link between misstatements and losses
- Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
- USA
- January 20 2012
-
Tags
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at ateague@lexology.com.
Jennifer Miller
Senior Legal Counsel, Bankwest Business
Bank of Western Australia Ltd
