In an amicus curiae brief, the Securities and Exchange Commission urged the Supreme Court to vacate the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. v. Tellabs, Inc., 437 F.3d 588 (7th Cir. 2006), on grounds that the Circuit Court misinterpreted the heightened pleading standards governing securities fraud claims imposed by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA). The SEC asserted that the Seventh Circuit’s holding, that plaintiffs need merely to allege sufficient facts such that a “reasonable person” could infer that defendants acted with the intent to commit securities fraud, was flawed. The SEC argued that pursuant to the PSLRA, a “reasonable inference” of scienter is plainlyinsufficient. Instead, plaintiffs must allege facts creating a “strong inference” that defendants acted with a culpable state of mind. Furthermore, the SEC argued that the Seventh Circuit impermissibly declined to consider facts within plaintiff’s Complaint that supported a plausible inference that defendants did not intend to commit fraud.
Register Now As you are not an existing subscriber please register for your free daily legal newsfeed service.Register
If you have any questions about the service please contact firstname.lastname@example.org or call Lexology Customer Services on +44 20 7234 0606.
SEC supports heightened standards governing investors’ claims
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
- February 16 2007
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at email@example.com.
Senior Patent Counsel
Royal DSM NV