- On February 10, 2011, the Supreme Court of California held that zip codes are “personal identification information,” or “PII,” for purposes of the Song-Beverly Act and, as a result, they may not be required as a condition to the acceptance of credit cards as part of a transaction. The Act prohibits retailers from “request[ing], or requir[ing]” PII “as a condition to accepting the credit card.” The decision came in a case filed by a Williams-Sonoma customer who complained that the store had violated her rights under the Act by requesting her zip code during a credit card transaction, then recording and combining it with her name to find her address, and storing the information in a database for marketing purposes. Penalties under the Act are a maximum of $250 for the first violation and $1,000 for each violation thereafter. Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., No. S178241 (Cal. Feb. 10, 2011).
Register Now As you are not an existing subscriber please register for your free daily legal newsfeed service.
RegisterIf you have any questions about the service please contact customerservices@lexology.com or call Lexology Customer Services on +44 20 7234 0606.
Privacy news
- Arent Fox LLP
- Ross A. Buntrock , Jonathan E. Canis , Alan G. Fishel , Michael B. Hazzard , Jeffrey E. Rummel and G. David Carter
- USA
- February 21 2011
-
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at ateague@lexology.com.
![]()
Audrey E Mross
Labor & Employment Attorney
Munck Carter LLP
