Skip to content
  • PRO
  • Events
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
      • Influencers
      • Lexology European Awards 2026
      • Client Choice Dinner 2026
  • Lexology Compete
  • About
  • Help centre
  • Blog
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
Lexology Article

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.

Register

DMCA saves Google again—im“Perfect” notices not adequate notice of infringement

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

USA August 23 2010

In Perfect 10, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Case No. CV 04-9484 (C.D. Cal. July 26, 2010), the court issued a decision consistent with a recent line of cases1 that generally favors online service providers that establish and implement effective policies under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”), keeps the burden to police infringement on content owners, and strictly construes the DMCA in determining whether content owners meet the DMCA notice requirements.2

 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP - James G. Gatto and Richard P. Hadorn, Jr.

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • Copyrights
  • Internet & Social Media
  • Litigation
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Topics

  • Copyright infringement
  • Legal burden of proof
  • Online service provider

Organisations

  • Google

Laws

  • Copyright Act 1976 (USA)
  • Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998 (UK)

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Use of illegal cell phone jammers leads to fines in excess of $125,000 *
  2. Delaware liberalizes procedures for issuance of stock *
  3. Contractor advertising in California *
  4. Contractor and tradesmen licensing and registration by state *
  5. Spotlight: Islamic financing and investment structures in USA *
Interested in contributing?
Get closer to winning business faster with Lexology's complete suite of dynamic products designed to help you unlock new opportunities with our highly engaged audience of legal professionals looking for answers.
Learn more
Powered by Lexology

Professional development

  • Entertainment & Media - IP Protection in Podcasts, Social Media & Digital Content - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 1.25 CPD hours
    Online
    12 May 2026
  • IP Protection in E-Commerce - Common Challenges & Practical Considerations - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 1.25 CPD hours
    Online
    5 June 2026
  • Intellectual Property Update - Recent Decisions & Developments Explored - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 1.5 CPD hours
    Online
    11 June 2026
View all

Related practical resources PRO

  • Checklist Checklist: Work for hire (USA)
  • Checklist Checklist: Addressing online defamation and protecting your digital reputation (UK)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: Protecting intellectual property when drafting sales or marketing agreements (USA)
View all

Related research hubs

Google

Copyright infringement

USA

Litigation

Internet & Social Media

Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Panoramic
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
  • Scanner
  • Contracts & clauses
Lexology Index
  • Find an expert
  • Reports
  • Research methodology
  • Submissions
  • FAQ
  • Instruct Counsel
  • Client Choice 2025
More
  • About us
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Help centre
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • TwitterFollow on X
  • LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2026 Law Business Research

Law Business Research