The Tribunal has confirmed FSA’s decision to ban and fine a sole trader. Mark Ainley knowingly submitted false and misleading mortgage applications and entered into sale and rent back arrangements without FSA authorisation. The defendant acted without integrity in breach of FSA’s Statements of Principle for Approved Persons (APER) Condition 1 and failed to meet the standard of suitability in FSA’s Threshold Condition 5. For this reason, the Tribunal has found it appropriate to cancel the Part IV permission of the defendant’s business, to withdraw his approval to carry out controlled functions, and to ban him from carrying out any functions in relation to any regulated activity. In addition, and given the defendant had also tried to deceive FSA in his witness statements, the Tribunal considers that it is also appropriate to impose a substantial financial penalty, the amount of which will be set in a further hearing. (Source: Mark Ainley v. FSA)
Register Now As you are not an existing subscriber please register for your free daily legal newsfeed service.
RegisterIf you have any questions about the service please contact customerservices@lexology.com or call Lexology Customer Services on +44 20 7234 0606.
Tribunal upholds fines for misleading mortgage applications
- Dentons
- Emma Radmore and Katharine Harle
- United Kingdom
- July 27 2012
-
Tags
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at ateague@lexology.com.
![]()
Dr Jürgen Fegbeutel
Legal Services Director
BMW (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd