A class of freelance authors sued publishers claiming that the electronic re-publication of their works violated their rights. The parties reached a settlement that divided the relief into three categories, and provided different recovery for each category. Although Category C encompassed more than 99% of the total claims, the bulk of the settlement compensation flowed to Categories A and B. Objectors argued that the named plaintiffs favored the fewer and more lucrative Category A and B claims over the more numerous Category C claims, and that the Category C claimants should have been separately represented as a subclass. The district court approved the settlement, but the Second Circuit reversed. In re Literary Works in Elec. Databases Copyright Litig., 654 F.3d 242 (2d Cir. 2011) (No. 05-5943). Objectors argued that even though class representatives held claims in all three categories, there was a substantial risk that the class representatives sacrificed the Category C claims in favor of more favorable compensation for Category A and B claims. The Second Circuit agreed, and held that to negotiate a fair settlement, Category C claims must be represented separately in a subclass. The court directed that, on remand, the district court establish three subclasses to negotiate a settlement.
Register Now As you are not an existing subscriber please register for your free daily legal newsfeed service.Register
If you have any questions about the service please contact firstname.lastname@example.org or call Lexology Customer Services on +44 20 7234 0606.
Second Circuit rejects settlement due to inadequate representation
- Jenner & Block
- Terrence J. Truax, Brent Caslin, Joseph A. Saltiel and Jeffrey A. Koppy
- January 31 2012
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at email@example.com.
“I enjoy the CLANZ newsstand and find it highly relevant to my job. I definitely have forwarded various articles to my colleagues on occasion where there is a point of general interest, particularly employment or IT law. I...
“I enjoy the CLANZ newsstand and find it highly relevant to my job. I definitely have forwarded various articles to my colleagues on occasion where there is a point of general interest, particularly employment or IT law. I really appreciate the service, it's a quick way for me to keep up to date in a way I wouldn't otherwise have time to.”