On 15 May 2008, the European Court of Justice gave its Judgment in the SECAP Case C-147 & 148/06, on reference from an Italian court. The key issue in the case was the application of the rules involving the treatment of abnormally low tenders in contracts valued below the procurement directive thresholds. Under the EU Directive, contracting authorities are required to take into account explanations before excluding a low tender. However, under Italian law, contracting authorities are entitled to automatically exclude contracts that are abnormally low, provided that there are five or more valid offers. However, despite the national provision, the municipality of Turin decided not to automatically exclude offers below the thresholds and its decision was challenged before the national courts. The ECJ took the view that the Italian legislation was itself objective and non-discriminatory but that there was a risk that automatic exclusion could prevent contracting authorities from assessing the viability of low tenders and this might result in an infringement of the principles of free movement and non-discrimination. The ECJ concluded therefore that it was up to the relevant contracting authority to assess whether there is a cross-border interest and to decide whether to apply the evaluation rule. However, the ECJ did find that, even where there is cross-border interest, it might be acceptable to automatically exclude tenders for being abnormally low if there are an unusually large number of tenders and detailed examination would be a burden on the contracting authority.
Register Now As you are not an existing subscriber please register for your free daily legal newsfeed service.Register
If you have any questions about the service please contact email@example.com or call Lexology Customer Services on +44 20 7234 0606.
ECJ rules on abnormally low tenders
- Nabarro LLP
- Cyrus Mehta and Rachel Bickler
- European Union, Italy
- June 3 2008
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at firstname.lastname@example.org.
"Lexology is a quick and useful indicator of developments in the legal sphere. It alerts me to changes taking place in the legal environment in South Africa that I may not otherwise have spotted or had immediate access...
"Lexology is a quick and useful indicator of developments in the legal sphere. It alerts me to changes taking place in the legal environment in South Africa that I may not otherwise have spotted or had immediate access to as a company lawyer. It definitely serves as a trigger for me to investigate such changes in the legal landscape in South Africa as they may affect my work and that of my employer. I believe that receiving Lexology provides me with a competitive advantage."
Dr Jürgen Fegbeutel
Legal Services Director
BMW (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd