According to a news source, Pennsylvania residents who allege property damage and personal injury in litigation against companies extracting natural gas by means of hydraulic fracturing have sought a protective order to deny the defendants access to their medical records. Fiorentino v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp., No. 09-2284 (U.S. Dist. Ct., M.D. Pa., pleading filed May 2, 2011). The court previously entered an order denying a defense motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ medical monitoring claim, and the plaintiffs have reportedly argued that their past or present physical health is not relevant to that claim under Pennsylvania law. The defendants apparently responded to the request for protective order by arguing, “To prove a remedy of medical monitoring trust fund, Plaintiffs must show [that] monitoring beyond that normally recommended in the absence of exposure is required. A jury cannot determine what is beyond that normally recommended for each individual without knowledge of the Plaintiffs’ medical histories.” See Mealey’s Emerging Toxic Torts, May 17, 2011.
Register Now As you are not an existing subscriber please register for your free daily legal newsfeed service.Register
If you have any questions about the service please contact email@example.com or call Lexology Customer Services on +44 20 7234 0606.
Plaintiffs challenge need for medical records to support medical monitoring claim
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at firstname.lastname@example.org.
“The Lexology newsfeed is very relevant to my practice and I like that you can tailor the newsfeed to include specific practice areas. I enjoy seeing a variety of approaches and I will read multiple articles on the...
“The Lexology newsfeed is very relevant to my practice and I like that you can tailor the newsfeed to include specific practice areas. I enjoy seeing a variety of approaches and I will read multiple articles on the same topic for the purpose of getting the fullest understanding of a new law, a court case or other legal development.”
Audrey E Mross
Labor & Employment Attorney
Munck Carter LLP