In Three Days of the Condor, Robert Redford plays a CIA researcher who finds himself “in danger and in love.” ABA Model Rule 3.3 – Candor Toward the Tribunal — probably won’t help your love life, but there is plenty of danger involved; if you fail to comply, that is.
Rule 3.3 prohibits not only the making of false statements and submission of false evidence, but also omissions, like failing to correct a prior false statement or disclose adverse authority. Rule 3.3 is regarded as so important that, by its terms, it even trumps a lawyer’s duty of confidentiality.
Judges certainly regard it as important. Recently, a federal judge sua sponte ordered a group of lawyers from a firm to show cause why they should not be sanctioned for failing to comply with Rule 3.3. What did they do wrong? They failed to cite adverse relevant authority from a controlling Circuit Court in a motion to dismiss. Notably, the order was directed to all lawyers whose names appeared on the papers — two partners and an associate. Although the parties have since settled the case (with the law firm chipping in), the lawyers still have to answer to the judge.
I won’t blow the ending of Condor, but I can certainly tell you what will happen if you blow your duty of Candor. To learn more about both Condor and Candor, click on the attached.
Click here to view video.